ooОткрытое образованиеOpen Education1818-42432079-5939Plekhanov Russian University of Economics10.21686/1818-4243-2015-4(111-51-57oo-76Research ArticleОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНАЯ СРЕДАEDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTМетоды инженерии знаний в проектировании содержания распределенного образованияKNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING METHODS IN DISTRIBUTED EDUCATIONAL CONTENT DESIGNБойченкоГ. Н.BoychenkoGalina N.

кафедра теории и методики преподавания информатики

к.п.н., доцент, доцент

Тел.: +7 905 078-27-97

the Department of theory and methodology of teaching computer science

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, docent, assistant professor

Tel.: 7 9050782797

http://www.nkfi.ru/

galinaboychenko@gmail.comКундозероваЛ. И.KundozzerovaLiudmila I.

кафедра пенитенциарной психологии и пенитенциарной педагогики

д.п.н., профессор, профессор

Тел.: +7 960 913-25-00

http://ki.fsin.su/

the Department of Penitentiary Psychology and Penitentiary Pedagogy

Doctor of Education, professor, professor,

Tel.: +7 960 913-25-00

http://ki.fsin.su/

kundozerova@gmail.comКемеровский государственный университет, Новокузнецкий филиал (институт)РоссияNovokuznetsk Institute (Branch) of The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education «Kemerovo State University»Russian FederationКузбасский институт федеральной службы исполнения наказанийРоссияKuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of RussiaRussian Federation20152505201604(1115157Copyright © Бойченко Г.Н., Кундозерова Л.И., 20162016Бойченко Г.Н., Кундозерова Л.И.Boychenko G.N., Kundozzerova L.I.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://openedu.rea.ru/jour/article/view/76

Содержание распределенного образования рассматривается авторами как система автономных, интероперабельных образовательных объектов с возможностью многократного использования в различных контекстах. Описываются этапы проектирования содержания образования на основе методов онтологического инжиниринга: идентификация знаний, концептуализация знаний, категоризация знаний, формализация знаний и реализация знаний. 

Educational content is considered by authors as a distributed system of learning objects, that are self-contained, interoperable, and reusable in multiple contexts. Phases of educational content design, based on ontology engineering methods, are described: knowledge identification, knowledge conceptualization, knowledge categorization, knowledge formalization, and knowledge implementation. 

распределенное образованиесодержание образованияметодология проектирования содержания образованияонтологический инжинирингdistributed educationeducational contenteducational content design methodologyontology engineeringReferencesКраевский В.В., Бережнова Е.В. Методология педагогики: новый этап / 2-е изд., стер. – М: Академия, 2008. – 393 с.Краевский В.В., Бережнова Е.В. Методология педагогики: новый этап / 2-е изд., стер. – М: Академия, 2008. – 393 с.Hutchins E. Distributed cognition. In: The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp 2068–2072, 2001.Hutchins E. Distributed cognition. In: The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp 2068–2072, 2001.Hutchins E. Cognitive artifacts // The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, R.A. Wilson & F.C. Keil (eds), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. – 1999. P. 126–128.Hutchins E. Cognitive artifacts // The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, R.A. Wilson & F.C. Keil (eds), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. – 1999. P. 126–128.The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Edited by David A. Wiley. Agency for Instructional Technology and the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. 2002. 298 p. ISBN: 0-7842-0892-1. Online version is available at http://reusability.org/ read/The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Edited by David A. Wiley. Agency for Instructional Technology and the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. 2002. 298 p. ISBN: 0-7842-0892-1. Online version is available at http://reusability.org/ read/1484.12.1-2002 IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata. Final draft standard. 15 July 2002. URL: http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_ Final_Draft.pdf1484.12.1-2002 IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata. Final draft standard. 15 July 2002. URL: http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_ Final_Draft.pdfGruber T.R. Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing // International Journal Human-Computer Studies. – 1995. – Vol. 43(5–6). – P. 907–928.Gruber T.R. Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing // International Journal Human-Computer Studies. – 1995. – Vol. 43(5–6). – P. 907–928.Dr. Tom Gruber’ s (Co-founder and Chief Technical Officer of Intraspect Software) Interview For the Official Quarterly Bulletin of AIS Special Interest Group on Semantic Web and Information Systems. – 2004. – Vol. 1, Issue 3. URL: http://tomgruber.org/ writing/sigsemis-2004.pdfDr. Tom Gruber’ s (Co-founder and Chief Technical Officer of Intraspect Software) Interview For the Official Quarterly Bulletin of AIS Special Interest Group on Semantic Web and Information Systems. – 2004. – Vol. 1, Issue 3. URL: http://tomgruber.org/ writing/sigsemis-2004.pdfGavrilova T., Leshcheva I., Rumyantseva M. Knowledge Elicitation Methods Taxonomy: Russian view // Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. – 2011. – Vol. 6881/2011. – P. 337–346.Gavrilova T., Leshcheva I., Rumyantseva M. Knowledge Elicitation Methods Taxonomy: Russian view // Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. – 2011. – Vol. 6881/2011. – P. 337–346.Cohen H., Lefebvre, C. Handbook of Categorization in cognitive science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2005. – 1136 p.Cohen H., Lefebvre, C. Handbook of Categorization in cognitive science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2005. – 1136 p.Rosch E. Prototype classification and logical classification: The two systems // E.F.Scholnick (Ed.), New trends in conceptual representation: Challenges to Piaget’s theory? – Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983. – P. 73–86.Rosch E. Prototype classification and logical classification: The two systems // E.F.Scholnick (Ed.), New trends in conceptual representation: Challenges to Piaget’s theory? – Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983. – P. 73–86.Protégé. A free, open-source ontology editor and framework for building intelligent systems. Official site. URL: http://protege.stanford.edu/Protégé. A free, open-source ontology editor and framework for building intelligent systems. Official site. URL: http://protege.stanford.edu/Reigeluth C.M., Merrill M.D. Bunderson C.V. The structure of subject matter content and its instructional design implications // Instructional Science, 1978. – Vol. 7(2). – P. 107–126.Reigeluth C.M., Merrill M.D. Bunderson C.V. The structure of subject matter content and its instructional design implications // Instructional Science, 1978. – Vol. 7(2). – P. 107–126.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.