Preview

Open Education

Advanced search

The PDCA Cycle and the Point-Rating System for Assessing Students’ Knowledge: Ways to Improve the Quality of Education (Based on the Materials of the Discipline “Business Process Management”)

https://doi.org/10.21686/10.21686/1818-4243-2024-6-4-12

Abstract

The purpose of the study. We hypothesize that the use of a point-rating system in teaching helps to increase the student’s internal motivation in studying the discipline, improves the quality of education. Then the purpose of this study will be to analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the use of the point-rating system for evaluating students’ knowledge for the Management direction. The study is mainly aimed at determining the impact of the point-rating system on the quality of students’ knowledge and skills acquisition in the study of the discipline “Business   Process Management”, as well as analyzing students’ perception of this assessment system and its impact on learning motivation, activity in the classroom and self-assessment of their knowledge. The research methods. Let’s consider how the process of forming the point-rating system is in the study of the discipline “Business Process Management”, based on the statistical data of the lecturer, we will test the hypothesis of improving the quality of knowledge when using the methodology of the point-rating system based on the results of the work of second-year students of the Faculty of Higher school of management; we will identify the degree of motivation of students to master the educational program. We will analyze the students’ academic performance at the time of accumulation of points and during the exam, present a comparison of the results of the accumulated assessment and the final one. The information base of the study was the material of classes at the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation on the discipline “Business Process Management” for second-year students of the Management program

Results. An important place in the educational process management system is the point-rating assessment system. As already noted, one of the goals of the point-rating system application at a Financial University is to stimulate the systematic work of students during the semester (module). This means that the lecturer must develop the system so that students complete assignments systematically, not just when the next grading checkpoint is approaching. It is the systematic fulfillment of the proposed tasks that guarantees the full study of the discipline, improving the quality of study and, importantly, increasing the motivation of students to acquire knowledge. The results of the study showed the effectiveness of this technique and its focus on the personal characteristics of the student. A student can gain points by completing a given amount of work, setting priorities independently. At the same time, the quality of education   does not decrease. Conclusion. The use of the point-rating system in modern universities has   long been a matter of habit. However, the requirements for the quality of teaching are increasing every year, on the part of both students and employers. This study identifies the stages of improvement by quality management using the PDCA cycle in the development and use of the point-rating system for evaluating knowledge in the learning process,   analyzing teaching and making changes and additions. The tools of these   approaches are described, as well as ways to improve the quality of teaching using the example of the discipline “Business Process Management”.

About the Authors

G. B. Pestunova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Galina B. Pestunova - Cand. Sci. (Economics), Associate Professor,
Associate Professor of the Department of Industry and Operational Management



S. A. Ulyanova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Svetlana A. Ulyanova - Cand. Sci. (Economics), Associate Professor,
Associate Professor of the Department of General and Project Management



References

1. «Polozheniye o provedenii tekushchego kontrolya uspevayemosti i promezhutochnoy attestatsii obuchayushchikhsya po programmam bakalavriata i magistratury v Finansovom universitete» Prikaz ot 23.03.2017 №0557/o =. «Regulations on the current monitoring of academic performance and midterm assessment of students in bachelor’s and master’s degree programs at the Financial University» Order of 23.03.2017 No. 0557 / o [Internet]. Avalable from: http://www.fa.ru/org/chair/save/Pages/kriterii-bak.aspx. (In Russ.)

2. Mazuritskaya M. A. Point-rating system as a means of motivating students to study (on the example of the academic discipline «Library pedagogy»). Kul’tura: teoriya i praktika = Culture: Theory and Practice. 2022: 2(47). (In Russ.)

3. Borshchenko G. M. Cumulative point-ratingsystem as a factor accompanying the educational process. Pedagogicheskiy IMIDZH = Pedagogical IMAGE. 2022; 16; 3(56): 317-335. DOI: 10.32343/2409-5052-2022-16-3-317-335. (In Russ.)

4. Geta A. A., Shatalova N. P. Point-rating system for assessing knowledge, skills and abilities in the process of digitalization of education. Konstruktivnyye pedagogicheskiye zametki = Constructive pedagogical notes. 2021; 9-2(16): 228-237. (In Russ.)

5. Mikhteyev S. SH., Mikhteyeva Ye. YU. Point-rating system - a factor in activating the cognitive activity of students. Sovremennoye obrazovaniye: soderzhaniye, tekhnologii, kachestvo = Modern education: content, technology, quality. 2021; 1: 78-80. (In Russ.)

6. Senetskaya L., Bozhenova K. Point-rating system as a tool for managing the educational process. Deutsche Internationale Zeitschrift für Zeitgenössische Wissenschaft. 2021; 15: 42-44. DOI: 10.24412/2701-8369-2021-15-42-44.

7. Telepova M. V., Krivonozhko K. A. Point-rating assessment system and its impact on the quality of the educational process. Ratio et Natura. 2021: 2(4).

8. Kalaydov A. N., Ryukina A. A. Point-rating system of knowledge assessment in the context of a nationally-oriented approach to teaching foreign students of engineering specialties. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye = Scientific and pedagogical review. 2021; 4(38): 99-107. DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2021-4-99-107. (In Russ.)

9. Brazhnik M. V. Interactive assessment and point-rating system in the discipline «Fundamentals of Accounting». Chelovek. Sotsium. Obshchestvo = Man. Society. Society. 2022; 7: 43-50. (In Russ.)

10. Dubovikova Ye. P. Point-rating system as a criterion for the effectiveness of students’ independent work in distance learning. NAUKA YUUrGU. SEKTSII TEKHNICHESKIKH NAUK: materialy 74-y nauchnoy konferentsii = SCIENCE SUSU. SECTIONS OF TECHNICAL SCIENCES: Proceedings of the 74th Scientific Conference (Chelyabinsk, April 19, 2022). Chelyabinsk: Publishing Center of SUSU; 2022: 13-17. (In Russ.)

11. Larionova N. B. Point-rating system of knowledge assessment as an effective motivation of students for successful learning. Uchenyye zapiski Kazanskogo filiala «Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta pravosudiya» = Scientific notes of the Kazan branch of the «Russian State University of Justice». 2022; 18: 311-316. (In Russ.)

12. Borodina S. A., Yevdokimov M. A. Rating system of learning assessment as a condition for successful educational activity of a student of a technical university. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye nauki = Bulletin of Samara State Technical University. Series: Psychological and pedagogical sciences. 2012; 2(18): 32-38. (In Russ.)

13. Grodzenskiy S. YA., Grodzenskiy YA. S. PDCA cycle and seven quality tools. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva = Quality management methods. 2013; 11: 20-24. (In Russ.)

14. Grebnev L. S. General cultural competencies and educational technologies. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii = Higher education in Russia. 2015; 10: 48 51. (In Russ.)

15.

16.


Review

For citations:


Pestunova G.B., Ulyanova S.A. The PDCA Cycle and the Point-Rating System for Assessing Students’ Knowledge: Ways to Improve the Quality of Education (Based on the Materials of the Discipline “Business Process Management”). Open Education. 2024;28(6):4-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/10.21686/1818-4243-2024-6-4-12

Views: 173


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-4243 (Print)
ISSN 2079-5939 (Online)