Contingency, cognitive and semiotic approaches to decision-making in the organizations
https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2016-6-9-17
Abstract
The purpose of this work consists in the conceptual analysis of a current state and the practical importance of some approaches to decision-making in the conditions of uncertainty. The article shows the approaches to decision-making in poorly defined and semistructured situations (objects, organizations), descriptions are presented in a linguistic kind in the form of expert knowledge, value judgment and hypothetical assumptions. Contingency, cognitive and semiotic approaches to support of decision-making in such cases are considered.
The material statement is based on the analysis of the Russian and foreign scientific publications under the considered approaches in the historical aspect. In the beginning the approach description in a statement of its founders is carried out. Then the short review, significant from the author’s point of view, modern theoretical and practical works in a considered direction in Russia and abroad is presented. Further the author’s point of view, concerning advantages, lacks, constructiveness and prospects of the considered approach is presented.
The analysis result is the basic ideas in a general view, a current state, an estimation of the practical importance of the considered approaches to decision-making. These results can be useful to developers of systems of decision-making support and lecturers of higher educational institutions as a methodical material in processes of students’ training in decisionmaking and artificial intellect areas.
About the Author
A. A. Kulinich
Institute of Control Sciences, RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Engineering Sciences Senior Researcher,
Moscow
References
1. Surmin Yu.P. (red), Sidorenko A., Loboda V, Furda A, Katerynyak I., Meer K. Situatsionnyy analiz, ili anatomiya keys metoda/ – Kiev: Tsentr innovatsiy i razvitiya, 2002. – P. 286. (in Russ.)
2. Pospelov D.A. Situatsionnoe upravlenie: teoriya i praktika. – M.: Nauka, 1986. – P. 288. (in Russ.)
3. Klykov Yu.I. Situatsionnoe upravlenie bol’shimi sistemami. – M.: Energiya, 1974. – P. 136. (in Russ.)
4. Axelrod R. The Structure of Decision: Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. – Princeton. University Press, 1976.
5. Checkland P.B. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. – New York: Wiley. 1981.
6. Ryabov V.B. Upravlenie kachestvom trudovoy zhizni v organizatsii c ispol’zovaniem kognitivnykh kart // Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya. – 2013. – T. 6, № 3. – Pp. 110–121. (in Russ.)
7. Sosedov G.A. Menedzhment kachestva sistemy obrazovaniya // Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya. – 2013. – № 1(19). (in Russ.)
8. Kanaeva E.I. Kognitivnoe modelirovanie riska neshtatnogo padeniya otdelyayushcheysya chasti raketynositelya // Kosmonavtika i raketostroenie. – 2014. – № 3(76). – Pp. 79–87. (in Russ.)
9. Fadeev V.A. Formalizatsiya problemy razvitiya generiruyushchikh moshchnostey v izolirovannom rayone // Tr. Bratskogo gos. un-ta. Ser.: Estestvennye i inzhenernye nauki. – 2013. – Part 1 . – Pp. 61–64. (in Russ.)
10. Bashlykov A.A. Printsipy postroeniya perspektivnykh korporativnykh informatsionnykh sistem intellektual’noy podderzhki prinyatiya resheniy v upravlenii i biznese transporta nefti // Avtomatizatsiya, telemekhanizatsiya i svyaz’ v neftyanoy promyshlennosti. – 2013. – № 8. – Pp. 9–19. (in Russ.)
11. Avdonin B.N., Khrustalev E.Yu., Khrustalev O.E. Kognitivnaya metodologiya strukturizatsii znaniy dlya izucheniya i primeneniya finansovo-ekonomicheskikh innovatsiy// Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya. – 2013. № 35. Pp. 2–13. (in Russ.)
12. Papageorgiou E.I. A Review study on Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and their applications during the last decade // Proc. Of IEEE Intern. Conf. of Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ IEEE). – 2011, 27–30 June. – Taipei, Taiwan. – P. 828–835.
13. Pospelov D.A., Osipov G.S. Prikladnaya semiotika// Novosti iskusstvennogo intellekta. – 1999. – № 1. – Pp. 9–35. (in Russ.)
14. Osipov G.S. Ot situatsionnogo upravleniya k prikladnoy semiotike// Novosti iskusstvennogo intellekta. – 2002. – № 6. – Pp. 56–59. (in Russ.)
15. Biryukov B.V. Teoriya smysla Gotloba Frege / V kn.: Primenenie logiki v nauke i tekhnike. – M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1960. – Pp. 502–555. (in Russ.)
16. Sossyur F. Kurs obshchey lingvistiki. Per. s fr. – M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. – P. 256. (in Russ.)
17. Pirs Ch.S. Chto takoe znak? // Vestnik Tomskogo gos. un-ta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. – 2009. – № 3(7). – Pp. 88–95. (in Russ.)
18. Morris Ch.U. Osnovaniya teorii znakov // Semiotika: antologiya. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. M.– Ekaterinburg, 2001. Pp. 45–97. (in Russ.)
19. Erlikh A.I. Prikladnaya semiotika i upravlenie slozhnymi ob»ektami// Programmnye produkty i sistemy. – 1997. – № 3. – Pp. 2–6. (in Russ.)
20. Averkin A.N., Golovina E.Yu. Nechetkaya semioticheskaya sistema upravleniya// Tr. Mezhdunar. Konf. «Intellektual’noe upravlenie: novye intellektual’nye tekhnologii v zadachakh upravleniya (ICIT’99)». Pereslavl’-Zalesskiy 6–9 dek. 1999 g. – M., 1999. – Pp. 141–145. (in Russ.)
21. Eremeev A.P., Tikhonov D.A., Shutova P.V. Podderzhka prinyatiya resheniy v usloviyakh neopredelennosti na osnove nemarkovskoy modeli// Izv. RAN: Teoriya sistem upravleniya. – 2003. – № 5. – Pp. 75–88. (in Russ.)
22. Tarasov V.B. Ot mnogoagentnykh sistem k intellektual’nym organizatsiyam. – M.: Editorial URSS, 2002. – Pp. 352. (in Russ.)
23. Val’kman Yu.R. Kognitivnaya semiotika: istoki i perspektivy//Integrirovannye modeli i myagkie vychisleniya v iskusstvennom intellekte. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov VII-y mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (IMMV-2013, Kolomna, 20–22 maya 2013 g.). – M.: Fizmatlit, 2013. – Part 1. – Pp. 48–61. (in Russ.)
24. Tarasov V.B. Ot semanticheskogo koda k kognitivnoy lingvistike, semiotike i informatike: nasledie V.V. Martynova //Otkrytye semanticheskie tekhnologii proektirovaniya intellektual’nykh sistem. Materialy IV-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-tekhnicheskoy konferentsii (Minsk, BGUIR, 20–22 fevralya 2014 g.). – Minsk: BGUIR, 2014. – Pp. 39–48. (in Russ.)
25. Averbukh V.L. Semiotika i osnovaniya teorii komp’yuternoy vizualizatsii // Filosofskie problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologiy i kiberprostranstva. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal (ISSN: 2305-3763) 2013. № 1. Pp. 26–41. [Electronic resource]: Available at: http://cyberspace.pglu.ru/upload/cyberspace/issues/2013/1/1_2013.pdf, (Accessed: 10.11.2016) (in Russ.)
26. Panov A.I. Issledovanie metodov, razrabotka modeley i algoritmov formirovaniya elementov znakovoy kartiny mira sub»ekta deyatel’nosti: Avtoref. diss. kand. fiz-mat. nauk. – Moskva: VTs RAN. 2015. – P. 22. (in Russ.)
27. Kulinich A.A. Semioticheskie kognitivnye karty. Part 2. Osnovnye opredeleniya i algoritmy. // Problemy upravleniya, 2016, № 2. Pp. 24–40. (in Russ.)
28. Averkin A.N., Kuznetsov O.P., Kulinich A.A., Titova N.V. Podderzhka prinyatiya resheniy v slabostrukturirovannykh predmetnykh oblastyakh. Analiz situatsiy i otsenka al’ternativ. Teoriya sistem i upravleniya. Vol. 3, 2006, Pp. 139–149. (in Russ.)
29. Massel’ L.V., Massel’ A.G. Semioticheskiy podkhod k sozdaniyu intellektual’nykh sistem situatsionnogo upravleniya v energetike. Trudy XLIII Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Informatsionnye tekhnologii v nauke, obrazovanii i upravlenii», pod red. prof. E.L. Gloriozova. – Moskva, 2015. – Pp. 182–193. (in Russ.)
30. Massel’ L.V., Massel’ A.G. Yazyk opisaniya i upravleniya znaniyami v intellektual’noy sisteme semioticheskogo tipa / Informatsionnye i matematicheskie tekhnologii v nauke i upravlenii // Trudy XX Baykal’skoy Vserossiyskoy konferentsii. Part 3. – Irkutsk: ISEM SO RAN, 2015. – Pp. 112–124. (in Russ.)
31. Massel’ A.G., Massel’ L.V. Integratsiya semiotiki, kognitivnoy grafiki i semanticheskogo modelirovaniya v intellektual’nykh semioticheskikh sistemakh situatsionnogo upravleniya. Trudy VI Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii OSTIS, Belarus’, Minsk, BGUIR. 2016. – Pp. 71–76. (in Russ.)
32. Gudwin R.R. From semiotics to computational semiotics. In Proc. Of the 9th International Congress of the German Society for Semiotic Studies / 7th International Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (IASS/AIS). – Dresden, 1999.
33. Andersen P.B. A Theory of Computer Semiotics: Semiotic Approaches to Construction and Assessment of Computer Systems. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. – 460 p.
34. Barron T.M., Chiang Roger H.L., Storey V.C. A semiotics framework for information systems classification and development // Decision Support Systems. – 1999. – N 25. – P. 1–17.
35. Goguen J. An Introduction to Algebraic Semiotics, with Applications to User Interface Design // Computation for Metaphor, Analogy and Agents, ed. by Ch. Nehaniv, Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. – 1999. – Vol. 1562. – P. 242–291.
36. Berners-Lee T., Hendler J., Lassila O. The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May 2001, p. 29–37.
Review
For citations:
Kulinich A.A. Contingency, cognitive and semiotic approaches to decision-making in the organizations. Open Education. 2016;(6):9-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2016-6-9-17
Views:
1595
Email this article 