Preview

Open Education

Advanced search

Cyberneticization of the sense function in an intellectual control system

https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2017-3-4-12

Abstract

In the present work, from the standpoint of cybernetics, a sensible psychic function is considered, proposed by K.Jung in the framework of analytical psychology. The peculiarities of this function enabled Jung to distinguish it as an independent equivalent function of thinking, feeling and intuition, and to describe perceptive psychological types (extraverted and introvert). The special research in this work is carried out in view of the practical lack of similar materials by other researchers and the need to understand the meaning and role of the sensation function in the intellectual control system of the new generation, as a cybernetic system, expressing the ideas of analytical psychology. This work is based on the publications of well-known practicing psychologists and specialists in the field of cybernetics, as well as on the results of previous studies by the authors. An in-depth analysis of the properties of the sensory function, undertaken according to the given psychological descriptions, made it possible to correlate these properties with the positions of cybernetics in the part of information transmission and control. In order to correctly describe the action of the sensory function, two operations are proposed: diffusion (blurring) and contraction (concentration) of sensory images. The results of this study indicate that in natural systems, the sensory function operates already in the sensory perception of objective reality, and the operation of the sensible function determines the modes of operation of mental functions in any intellectual system that satisfies the provisions of analytical psychology. The meaning and role of the tangible function in the intellectual control system go well beyond the limits of only “simple transmission of images”, indicated by Jung. Analysis of the results of the study showed that it was the sensible function that could be provided for the psychic attitudes “extraversion” and “introversion”, as well as for a number of other phenomena noticed, but not explained by Jung. In addition, from the analysis of the properties of the tangible function, it is possible to hypothesize the possibility of describing the behavior of an intellectual system that has the “freedom of choice”, based on the cybernetic analogue of the phenomenon of fusion.

About the Authors

G. G. Vorob’ev
V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior Researcher


L. D. Dmitrenko
V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior Researcher


References

1. Zhdanov A.A. Avtonomnyi iskusstvennyi intellekt. Moscow: Binom Lab. znanii, 2009. (In Russ.) 2. Khokins Dzh., Bleiksli S. Ob intellekte. Moscow: Vil’yams, 2007. (In Russ.)

2. Rassel S., Norvig P. Iskusstvennyi intellekt. Sovremennyi podkhod. Moscow: Vil’yams, 2006. (In Russ.)

3. Kalyaev I.A., Gaiduk A.R., Kapustyan S.G. Raspredelennye sistemy planirovaniya deistvii kollektivov robotov. Moscow: Yanus-K, 2002. (In Russ.)

4. Vasil’ev S.N., Zherlov A.K., Fedosov E.A., Fedunov B.E. Intellektnoe upravlenie dinamicheskimi sistemami. Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2000. (In Russ.)

5. Jung S.G. Analytical Psychology: Its Theory and Practice. The Tavistock Lectures. London a. Henley, 1968, P. 224.

6. Chernavskii D.S. Problema proiskhozhdeniya zhizni i myshleniya s tochki zreniya sovremennoi fiziki. Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk. V. 170. 2000. No. 2. P. 157–183. (In Russ.)

7. Berezina T.N. Metodiki issledovaniya glubinnykh osobennostei lichnosti. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo IPRAN, 1997. P. 48. (In Russ.)

8. Freid Z. Vvedenie v psikhoanaliz. Lektsii. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. P. 456. (In Russ.)

9. Maklakov A.G. Obshchaya psikhologiya. Saint-Petersburg: Piter. 2001. (In Russ.)

10. Veininger O. Pol i kharakter. Translated from German. Moscow: Forum XIX–XX–XXI, 1991. P. 192. (In Russ.)

11. Vorob’ev G.G., Dmitrenko L.G. Arkhitekturnye printsipy postroeniya intellektual’nykh sistem. Saarbrücken, Deutschland: LAMBERT Academic Pablishing, 2015. P 65. (In Russ.)

12. Zhaboedov G.D., Skripnik R.L. et al. Oftal’mologiya. VSI Meditsina 2011. P. 451. (In Russ.)

13. Kruglov V.V., Dli M.I. Intellektual’nye informatsionnye sistemy: komp’yuternaya podderzhka sistem nechetkoi logiki i nechetkogo vyvoda. Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2002. (In Russ.)

14. Vorob’ev G.G., Dmitrenko L.G. Kibernetizatsiya funktsii chuvstvovaniya i intuitsii dlya intellektual’noi upravlyayushchei sistemy. Moscow: Otkrytoe obrazovanie. 2016. No. 6. P. 65–69. (In Russ.)

15. Andronov A.A., Leontovich E.A,. Gordon I.M., Maier A.G. Teoriya bifurkatsii dinamicheskikh sistem na ploskosti. Moscow: Nauka, 1967. (In Russ.)

16. Shopengauer A. Svoboda voli i nravstvennost’. Moscow: Respublika, 1992. P. 448. (In Russ.)

17. Rashevskii P.K. Kurs differentsial’noi geometrii. 3 ed., Moscow: 1950. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Vorob’ev G.G., Dmitrenko L.D. Cyberneticization of the sense function in an intellectual control system. Open Education. 2017;(3):4-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2017-3-4-12

Views: 918


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-4243 (Print)
ISSN 2079-5939 (Online)