Development of the educational activity monitoring system on the basis of competence-based approach

In this paper we give the mathematical description of the model of transferring the grades, obtained by students, based on the results of completing tasks into the assessment of the level of mastering competencies by them, the description is given of the educational activity monitoring system developed according to a mathematical model on the basis of competence-based approach, and the results of assessing its efficiency. Research goal: to reveal the interrelation between score estimates of the student and level of mastering competences and to make the process of determining the level of mastering competences automatic. The mathematical model of the grades transfer to assessing the level of mastering competences is developed in order to achieve this goal. The formulas solving this problem are presented. A study manual was created based on the developed mathematical model, which is intended for: 1) creating and maintaining reference books (teachers, students, competences, disciplines, means of estimation); 2) maintaining the online journal of students’ progress record; 3) determining the level of mastering competences in accordance with the developed algorithm; 4) maintaining the mechanism of data access restriction; 5) forming reports of the registered form of various complexity degrees. The task was solved by means of this study manual. Materials and methods: the fund of estimation means for the subject served as the material for the research, it contains data on the number of points, that a student can receive in the course of studying the subject, and direct distribution of these points for a certain kind of activity and competences which are formed in the course of studying the given subject. The journal of student’s progress is described, reflecting the received number of points in the course of studying the subject by each type of occupation. Results: Because of using the developed software program, the level of mastering each of the competences was obtained, which are formed in the course of studying a certain subject, expressed as a percentage. A number of experiments were conducted in order to obtain the research results. The results of two experiments are presented in this article. For descriptive reasons the results are also presented graphically in the chart form. Conclusions: according to the results of the conducted experiments it is possible to make a conclusion that this study manual completely satisfies the described tasks and gives the opportunity to automatically estimate not only the amount of the gained knowledge, but its quality, as well.

1. Podol'naya N.N., Leshchaikina M.V., Eremeeva M.A., Arkhipova K.N. Primenenie statisticheskikh metodov v issledovanii uspevaemosti studentov VUZa kak sostavlyayushchei kachestva obrazovaniya // Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2013. No.10- 2. (In Russ.)

2. Sosnitskii V.N., Potanin N.I. Analiz faktorov, ispol'zovannykh dlya approksimatsii srednei uspevaemosti studentov // Novye obrazovatel'nye tekhnologii v vuze (NOTV-2013): sbornik materialov X Mezhdun. nauchn.-metodich. konf., (Ekaterinburg, 6–8 February, 2013). Ekaterinburg: UrFU, 2013. (In Russ.)

3. Sosnitskii V.N., Potanin N.I., Sheveleva L.V. “Problemy statistichskogo analiza srednei uspevaemosti studentov” // Fundamental Research. 2013. No.10. P. 316–320. (In Russ.)

4. Sosnitskii V.N., Potanin N.I. Otsenka vozmozhnosti approksimatsii uspevaemosti studentov po dannym testirovaniya // Novye obrazovatel'nye tekhnologii v vuze (NOTV-2012): sbornik materialov IX Mezhdun. nauchn.-metodich. konf., (Ekaterinburg, 8–10 February, 2012) Ekaterinburg: UrFU. 2012. P. 522–529. (In Russ.)

5. Sosnitskii V.N., Potanin N.I. Veroyatnostnyi podkhod k analizu uspevaemosti studentov // Fundamental Research. 2014. No. 8. P. 734–738. (In Russ.)

6. Tashkenova T. Proekt informatsionnoi sistemy «uchet uspevaemosti studentov» // Mater. reg. nauchn.-prakt. konf. obuchayushchikhsya i studentov. Tyumen', 2014. P. 21–23. (In Russ.)

7. Naumova N.A. Modelirovanie informatsionnoi sistemy upravleniya kachestvom obrazovaniya // Vestnik YuRGTU (NPI). 2011. No. 1. P. 164–169. (In Russ.)

8. Rybanov A.A., Makushkina L.A. Tekhnologiya opredeleniya vesovykh koeffitsientov slozhnosti tem distantsionnogo kursa na osnove algoritma Saati // Otkrytoe i distantsionnoe obrazovanie. 2016. No. 1. P. 69–79. (In Russ.)

9. Rybanov A.A., Makushkina L.A. Formaty i sistemy komand, metody adresatsii. Kvantovannyi uchebnyi tekst s zadaniyami v testovoi forme // Pedagogicheskie izmereniya. 2015. No. 1. P. 50–58. (In Russ.)

10. Sosnitskii V.N., Potanin N.I., Sheveleva L.V. Problemy vnedreniya reitingovoi sistemy v vuze // Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya obrazovaniya v Rossii. 2013 No.13. P.111–115. (In Russ.)

11. Bermus A.G. Problemy i perspektivy realizatsii kompetentnostnogo podkhoda v obrazovanii // Internet-zhurnal «Eidos». 2010. (In Russ.)

12. Ivanov D.A., Mitrofanov K.G., Sokolova O.V. Kompetentnostnyi podkhod v obrazovanii. Problemy, ponyatiya, instrumentarii. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. M.: APKiPRO, 2012. 101 p. (In Russ.)

13. Kogan E.Ya. Kompetentnostnyi podkhod i novoe kachestvo obrazovaniya // Sovremennye podkhody k kompetentnostno-orientirovannomu obrazovaniyu / Pod red. A. V. Velikanovoi. Samara: Profi, 2011. (In Russ.)

14. Lebedev O.E. Kompetentnostnyi podkhod v obrazovanii // Shkol'nye tekhnologii. 2010. No. 5. P. 3–12. (In Russ.)

15. Medintseva I.P. Kompetentnostnyi podkhod v obrazovanii // Pedagogicheskoe masterstvo: mater. II mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (Moscow, December, 2012). M.: Buki-Vedi, 2012. (In Russ.)

16. Fedorov S.E. Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie aspekty provedeniya komp'yuternogo testirovaniya studentov. Otsenka kachestva obrazovaniya pri realizatsii kompetentnostnogo podkhoda URL : http://www.masters.donntu.edu.ua/2008/ mech/odinokova/library/1.htm (In Russ.)

17. Mikhailenko T.S. Kompetentnostnyi podkhod v otsenivanii kachestva rezul'tatov obucheniya studentov // Nauchno-metodicheskii elektronnyi zhurnal «Kontsept». 2014. No. S22. P. 51–55. (In Russ.)

18. Rybanov A. Metodika otsenki i analiza urovnya sformirovannosti kompetentsii po rezul'tatam prokhozhdeniya proizvodstvennoi praktiki // Pedagogicheskie izmereniya. 2015. No. 1. P. 75–85. (In Russ.)

19. Fomin N.V. Tekhnologiya razrabotki trebovanii k rezul'tatam obrazovaniya v kontekste FGOS VPO // Standarty i monitoring v obrazovanii. 2013. No. 4(91). P. 24. (In Russ.)

20. Pashkevich A.V. Sozdanie sistemy otsenivaniya klyuchevykh kompetentsii uchashchikhsya massovoi shkoly: monografiya. M.: ITs RIOR: NITs Infra-M, 2013. P. 13. (In Russ.)

21. Kaikova L.V., Evstaf'eva A.V., Tikhomirova L.F. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie predposylki uspevaemosti studentov // Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik. 2011. No. 3. T. II (Psikhologopedagogicheskie nauki). P. 55. (In Russ.)