Students’ opinions about modern lecture: development path

As an objective of the research, the author set the task of identifying students’ opinion and opinion of lecturers about the purpose of the lectures at the university, about the role of the lecturer and preferred form of lectures. As a result of the research, it was necessary to answer the following important questions: What are the objectives of the lecture and the role of the lecturer? Which lectures are more preferable: traditional or interactive? What do lecturers expect from the lecture, do they consider it an advantage or an unnecessary educational activity?
The materials were developed for the survey (questionnaire) to conduct the research and analyze the results obtained. The students were surveyed before training and after completion of the semester. The study involved 200 students of all areas of Mechanics and Technology Faculty of Novosibirsk State Technical University. Statistical analysis was used for the analysis of the results.
As a result, the experiment revealed nonconformity of opinions of students about the purpose of the lecture and the role of a lecturer before the training and after the end of the semester. Lectures, according to students, should help to implement all kinds of practical and independent assignments.
Educational standards imply a reduction in the hours of classroom training and an increase in independent work, and the majority of students are not ready (do not want to) to study the materials on the topics of discipline completely independently or partially.
It revealed a contradiction in opinion, what form of organization of the lecture classes is more interesting to students, which can increase the motivation of the visit and work on the lectures.
The technology of designing the educational process in the conditions of the mixed training is proposed, applying the technological map.
The technological map is presented in the form of stages of designing the educational process, including recommendations on the use of the online component of training. The main stages are – analysis of external requirements for the academic discipline, definition of organizational requirements and limitations, analysis of the target audience, goals and outcomes of the training, didactic analysis of the discipline, planning analysis of the effectiveness of the learning process.
An analysis of lecturers’ opinions and analysis of the study results of students’ opinions can be concluded about the need to help lectures in the design, using the appropriate methodology, developed in the form of a technological card. The proposed methodology for designing the learning process with the mixed training in conditions of binding to the activity into the audience, implemented in the form of a technological card can be an effective tool for teaching, allowing not only effectively designing the training process and to evaluate the quality, but also provide for measures to improve it.

1. Federal law from 29.12.2012 N 273-FZ (ed. 23.07.2013) «Ob obrazovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii». (In Russ.)

2. O programme razvitiya elektronnogo obrazovaniya na 2014-2020 gody. URL: https://www.herzen.spb.ru/img/files/puchkov/5MRG_19.09_PRAEO-Sobolev.pdf (In Russ.)

3. Pedagogika i psikhologiya vysshey shkoly: Uchebnoe posobie. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 2002. 544 p. (In Russ.)

4. Kraevskiy V.V., Khutorskoy A.V. Osnovy obucheniya: Didaktika i metodika. Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedeniy. Moscow: Izdatel’skiy tsentr «Akademiya», 2007. 352 p. (In Russ.)

5. Mukhina T.G. Aktivnye i interaktivnye obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii (formy provedeniya zanyatiy) v vysshey shkole: ucheb. posobie. Nizhny Novgorod: NNGASU, 2013. 97 p. URL: www.nngasu.ru/education/high_education/education_manual.pdf. (In Russ.)

6. Nadzharyan A.G., Samsonova E.K. Ispol’zovanie interaktivnykh tekhnologiy v protsesse obucheniya studentov pedagogicheskogo vysshego uchebnogo zavedeniya. Internet-zhurnal «NAUKOVEDENIE». 2015. Vol. 7. No. 3. URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/20PVN315.pdf. (In Russ.)

7. Abdullaeva O.S., Ismanova K.D., Mirzaev Zh.I. Organizatsiya uchebnoy deyatel’nosti vo vremya lektsionnykh, prakticheskikh, laboratornykh zanyatiy. Molodoy uchenyy. 2014. No. 19. P. 487–490. (In Russ.)

8. Fandey V.A. Smeshannoe obuchenie: sovremennoe sostoyanie i klassifikatsiya modeley smeshannogo obucheniya. Sistemnyy analiz, upravlenie i obrabotka informatsii Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i nauki. 2011. No. 4(12). P. 115–125. (In Russ.)

9. Garunov M.G. Pidkasistyy P.I. Samostoyatel’naya rabota studentov. Moscow: Znanie, 1978. (In Russ.)

10. Fomina A.S. Smeshannoe obuchenie v vuze: institutsional’nyy, organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskiy i pedagogicheskie aspekty. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2014. No. 21 P. 272–279. (In Russ.)

11. Veledinskaya S.B. Dorofeeva M.Yu. Smeshannoe obuchenie: tekhnologiya proektirovaniya uchebnogo protsessa. Otkrytoe i distantsionnoe obrazovanie. 2015. No. 2(58) P. 12–20. (In Russ.)

12. Kravchenko G.V. Ispol’zovanie modeli smeshannogo obucheniya v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya. Izvestiya AltGU. 2014. No. 2(82). P. 22–25. (In Russ.)

13. Samieva O.B., Sbitneva A.N. Samostoyatel’naya rabota studentov vuza v usloviyakh kreditnoy tekhnologii obucheniya. Vektor nauki Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: pedagogika.psikhologiya. 2013. 1(12). P. 226-229. (In Russ.)

14. Polevoy S.A., Pavlova V.V. Osobennosti obucheniya studentov s klipovym myshleniem. Otkrytoe obrazovanie. 2017. No. 2. P. 56-67. (In Russ.)

15. Legan M.V., Yatsevich T.A. Razrabotka tekhnologicheskoy karty proektirovaniya uchebnogo protsessa pri smeshannom obuchenii. Otkrytoe i distantsionnoe obrazovanie. 2016. No. 4(64). P. 65–73. (In Russ.)

16. Nagaeva I.A. Pedagogicheskiy dizayn i pedagogicheskoe proektirovanie: problemy i perspektivy. Informatizatsiya i svyaz’. 2012. No. 4. P. 61–64. (In Russ.)

17. Osipov M.V. Proektirovanie obrazovatel’nogo protsessa v ideologii «obratnogo dizayna». Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. No. 3. URL: https://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=19488. (In Russ.)

18. Loginova A.V. Osobennosti ispol’zovaniya i printsipy funktsionirovaniya pedagogicheskoy modeli «perevernutyy klass». Molodoy uchenyy. 2015. No. 9. P. 1114–1119. (In Russ.)

19. Legan M.V., Yatsevich T.A. Kombinirovannaya model’ obucheniya studentov na baze sistemy distantsionnogo obucheniya. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2014. No. 4. P. 136–141. (In Russ.)

20. Yatsevich T.A. Legan M.V. Ob aktual’nosti ispol’zovaniya mul’timediynykh elektronnykh obrazovatel’nykh resursov v obrazovatel’nom protsesse tekhnicheskikh vuzov. Innovatsii v obrazovanii. 2013. No. 11. P. 133–143. (In Russ.)