Knowledge management practices in oil companies
https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2018-6-27-38
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
The purpose of the study. In the economy of the 21st century, knowledge is the main source of obtaining sustainable competitive advantages of enterprises, and knowledge management (KM) is the main mechanism for ensuring and maintaining it. People and knowledge they possess, know-how, ability to innovate, trust relationships with customers and partners, and other intangible assets are becoming the most important sources of development for an organization. KM is traditionally carried out with the help of the following components: information technology, organizational processes and structures, corporate culture and people. In addition, there are complex tools of KM, which usually combine several KM components: a library of documents (knowledge base, corporate memory), communities of practice, lessons learned, etc. The purpose of this study is to illustrate the application of KM practices in companies in the oil industry of the Russian Federation.
Materials and methods. This article used the analysis of secondary data sources, and also reviewed in detail two cases, describing KM in the activities of oil companies in Russia. In order to understand at what stage is the development of the knowledge management system (KMS) in oil companies of Russia it’s necessary to compare the use of KM tools in foreign and domestic practice, this paper is based on information, provided in open sources. Observations are formed and the most prominent examples of the use of KM tools are indicated.
Results. The article provides an overview of KM tools, examples of their use in the oil and gas industries, and also examined the domestic practice of their use, based on cases of Russian oil companies. Examples of the use of KM tools, based on technologies and employees in foreign and Russian oil companies are pre-sented. On the example of cases of two well-known Russian oil companies, the stages of formation and de-velopment of knowledge management system in a company were considered, specific practices of KM, which appeared in companies at the respective stages of KMS development, were presented, as well as fea-tures of KM in each company.
Conclusion. For a number of reasons, oil companies are advocates of the proactive use of KM systems. In the course of the analysis, the trends of KM in the oil sector of the Russian economy were identified: com-plexity of use, poor acceptance of innovations, not related to production/technological processes, the begin-ning of the emergence of a policy of active knowledge sharing, a move towards creating a flexible KM sys-tem. This article will draw the attention of Russian managers to the issue of knowledge management and other intangible assets and identify management practices that will help Russian companies to successfully develop and compete, based on their intellectual capital. The article will also be of interest for specialists in knowledge management and practitioners from related fields.
About the Authors
Yu. A. BezginovaRussian Federation
Yulia A. Bezginova – Institute «High School of Management»
Saint Petersburgr
T. A. Garanina
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Garanina –Cand. Sci. (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of Finance and Accounting, Gaduate School of Management
Saint Petersburgr
D. V. Kudryavtsev
Russian Federation
Dmitriy V. Kudryavtsev– Cand. Sci. (Computer Science), Associate Professor, Information Technologies in Management Department, Graduate School of Management
Saint Petersburg
A. Yu. Pleshkova
Russian Federation
Anastasiya Yu. Pleshkova – Project support manager,GraduateSchool of management
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Bair J.H. The state of the product in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management. 1998; 2(2): 20-27.
2. Marwick A. D. Knowledge management technology. IBM systems journal. 2001; 40(4): 814830.
3. Maier R., Hädrich T., Peinl R. Enterprise knowledge infrastructures. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.
4. Gavrilova T.A., Kudryavtsev D.V. Glava 25 Informatsionnyye tekhnologii upravleniya znaniyami = Chapter 25 Information technologies of knowledge management. In: Monografiya «Innovatsionnoye razvitiye: ekonomika, intellektual’noye razvitiye, upravleniye znaniyami» ed. Mil’nera B. Z. = Monograph “Innovative development: economics, intellectual development, knowledge management” ed. Milnera B. Z. Moscow: Infra-M; 2009. [Internet] Available from: http://bigc.ru/publications/bigspb/km/itkm (cited: 08.04.2018) (In Russ.)
5. King W.R. Integrating knowledge management into IS strategy. Information Systems Management. 1999; 3: 70-72.
6. Harman C. and Brelade S. Knowledge Management and the Role of HR: Securing Competitive advantage in the knowledge economy. Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice Hall; 2000.
7. Egbu C.O. A conceptual framework for studying knowledge management in project-based environments. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Postgraduate Research in the Built Environment (University of Salford, UK, 15-16 March 2001) 2001; 10: 186-195.
8. Fong C. Y., Ooi K. B., Tan B. I., Lee V. H., Yee-Loong Chong, A. HRM practices and knowledge sharing: an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower. 2011; 32(5/6): 704-723.
9. Mentzas, G., Apostolou D., Abecker A., Young R. Knowledge Asset Management: Beyond the Process-centred and Product-centred Approaches. London: Springer; 2002. 200 p.
10. Milton N., Lambe P. The Knowledge Manager’s Handbook: A Step-by-step Guide to Embedding Effective Knowledge Management in Your Organization. Kogan Page Publishers; 2016.
11. Kudryavtsev D.V. Struktura sistemy upravleniya znaniyami = The structure of the knowledge management system. Sbornik trudov konferentsii «Upravleniye znaniyami i tekhnologii semanticheskogo veba 2010» = Proceedings of the conference «Knowledge Management and Semantic Web Technologies 2010» (December 4-5, 2010, St. Petersburg). Saint Petersburg: SPSU ITMO; 2010: 68-78. [Internet] Available from: http://bigc.ru/theory/km/docs/[www.bigc.ru]_2010_KESW.pdf (cited: 08.04.2018) (In Russ.)
12. Young R. Knowledge management tools and techniques manual. Asian Productivity Organization. 2010.
13. Milton N. KM in the Oil sector. Knoco stories: from the knowledge management frontline. 2014. [Internet] Available from: http://www.nickmilton.com/2014/06/km-in-oil-sector.html (cited: 01.03.2018)
14. Grant R. M. The development of knowledge management in the oil and gas industry. Universia Business Review. 2014; 40: 92-125.
15. Bezyayev P. Gazprom neft’ - Sistema upravleniya znaniyami i innovatsiyami = Gazprom Neft - Knowledge Management System and Innovations. 2016. [Internet] Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/valveindustryhub/ss62270654 (cited: 01.03.2018). (In Russ.)
16. Bezyayev P.P. Kak upravlyayut znaniyami v kompanii «Gazprom neft’» = How to manage knowledge in the company «Gazprom Neft». 2017. [Internet] Available from: https://hr-tv.ru/articles/author-opinion/kak-upravljajut-znaniem-v-kompaniigazprom-neft.html (cited: 01.03.2018). (In Russ.)
17. Viktorov E.G. Razvitiye Sistemy rasprostraneniya znaniy (SRZ) v BRD: itogi goda i plany = Development of the Knowledge Spreading System (SRH) in DU: Results of the Year and Plans. Pervaya interaktivnaya onlayn-konferentsiya po distantsionnomu obucheniyu i upravleniyu znaniyami
18. «Territoriya znaniy online» = First Interactive Online Conference on Distance Learning and Knowledge Management “Knowledge Territory online” November 30, 2017 Gazprom Neft. 2017. (In Russ.)
19. Baronov V. V. Ob”yedinyaya luchshikh = Combining the best. ITime 2010; 1(11): 6-9. (In Russ.)
20. Grosul M. V., Garanina T. A., Andreyev A. V., A. Ivanov A. YU. Intellectual capital management in the oil refining, petrochemical and gas processing unit of LUKOIL Innovatsii = Innovations. 2016; 5: 71-78. (In Russ.)
21. Andreeva T., Kianto A. Does knowledge management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2012; 16(4): 617-636.
22. Carneiro A. Howdoesknowledgemanagement influence innovation and competitiveness? Journal of Knowledge Management. 2000; 4(2): 87-98.
23. Adams G.L., Lamont B.T. Knowledge management systems and developing sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2003; 7(2): 142 - 154.
24. Chapman R., Magnusson M. Continuous innovation, performance and knowledge management: an introduction. Knowledge and Process Management. 2006; 13(3): 129-131.
25. Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. The knowledgecreating company. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
26. Edvinsson L. and Malone M. Intellectual capital: realising your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York: Harper Collins; 1997.
27. Zaim H., Tatoglu E. and Zaim S. Performance of knowledge management practices: a causal analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2007; 11(6): 54-67.
28. Andreyeva T., Garanina T., Ryzhko I. Upravleniye znaniyami i intellektual’nyy kapital v rossiyskikh promyshlennykh kompaniyakh. Rezul’taty issledovaniya 2015. = Knowledge management and intellectual capital in Russian industrial companies. Research results 2015. [Internet] Available from: https://gsom.spbu.ru/files/folder_7/km_report_2015_gsom.pdf (cited: 23.11.2018). (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Bezginova Yu.A., Garanina T.A., Kudryavtsev D.V., Pleshkova A.Yu. Knowledge management practices in oil companies. Open Education. 2018;22(6):27-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2018-6-27-38
ISSN 2079-5939 (Online)