Formation of the university electronic information-educational environment: interaction, development of professional thinking, management

Purpose of the research. The development of electronic technologies in modern socio-economic environment and the urgent need for their integration into higher education require a different type of teachers’ professional thinking based on their sustainable self-development. The paper provides a reflexive analysis of the implementation of electronic information-educational environment (EIEE) by the Yaroslavl branch of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics and offers an insight into interactive and management aspects of EIEE integration and use in the educational process.

Materials and methods. To achieve the goal, the EIEE structural and functional components were identified, stages, system requirements and technical features of EIEE implementation were determined along with the prospects for EIEE further integration and development within the university. Analysis, synthesis, comparison and generalization approaches were used as general scientific methods of this research.

Results. The paper gives an insight into the project of the Yaroslavl branch of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics on the use of EIEE as an imperative for high-level development of graduates’ common cultural, as well as general and specific professional competencies, to facilitate their competitiveness in the labour market. The urgency of innovations in the EIEE integration in universities is substantiated. The authors emphasize that the EIEE practical application requires achievement of a new level of communication skills, interaction of all participants in the educational process, based on a broader vision of the educational environment and a new level of teachers’ professional thinking, presupposing both creativity and management of their own mental processes associated with metacognition.

Conclusion. As a result, the authors make conclusions on the implementation of various aspects of the university EIEE, such as administrative, managerial and interactive ones. According to the study, a wide application of EIEE can become a priority tool in solving problems of the effectiveness, which is proved by the evidence and examples from the educational experience given in the article.

1. Komleva N.V. Professional competence of the individual in the conditions of Smart-society. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2017; 1: 27-33. (In Russ.)

2. Prokhorenkov P.A. Stages of formation of the electronic information and educational environment of the university. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya = International Journal of Experimental Education. 2016; 2-2: 291-294. (In Russ.)

3. Andreyeva N.B. Features of the information educational environment of a technical university. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern problems of science and education. 2013; 3: 261. (In Russ.)

4. Noskova T.N. Modern informational and educational environment of a pedagogical university. Vestnik Gertsenovskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Herzen University. 2007: 33-36. (In Russ.)

5. Osmolovskaya I.M., SHabalin YU.E. The composition and structure of the model of the educational process in the information educational environment. Vladimirskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. A.G. i N.G. Stoletovykh. Seriya pedagogicheskiye i psikhologicheskiye nauki = A.G. and N.G. Stoletovs Vladimir State University. A series of pedagogical and psychological sciences. 2014; 19 (38): 18-33. (In Russ.)

6. Abrosimov A.G. Teoreticheskiye i prakticheskiye osnovy sozdaniya informatsionno-obrazovatel’noy sredy vuza = Theoretical and practical bases for creating an information educational environment of a university. Samara: SGEA; 2003. 203 p. (In Russ.)

7. Sadulayeva B.S., Sadulayeva R.S. Designing the information and educational environment of the university. Novaya nauka: Strategii i vektory razvitiya = New Science: Strategies and Vectors of Development. 2015; 3: 21-27. (In Russ.)

8. Rubenko A.N. Information educational environment as an object of pedagogical research. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta imeni A.P. Chekhova = A.P. Chekhov Bulletin of the Taganrog Institute. 2017; 1: 106-110. (In Russ.)

9. Tikhomirov V.P., Dneprovskaya N.V. Smart education as the main paradigm of the information society development. Sovremennyye informatsionnyye tekhnologii i IT-obrazovaniye = Modern information technologies and IT education. 2015; 1(11): 9-13. (In Russ.)

10. Starodubtsev V.A., Frantsuzskaya E.O. Sustainable development of education: the connection of technology and pedagogy. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2017; 21(1): 34-43. (In Russ.)

11. Nazarov A.I. Opportunities of the Moodle software environment in the implementation of the modular learning principle. Fizicheskoye obrazovaniye v vuzakh = Physical education in universities. 2011; 17(4): 86-91. (In Russ.)

12. Ostroumova E.N. Information and educational environment of the university as a factor in the professional and personal self-development of the future specialist. Fundamental’nyye issledovaniya = Basic Research. 2011; 4: 37-40. (In Russ.)

13. Tret’yakova O.N. The use of elements of distance learning in the system of differentiated education of students of technical universities. Fizicheskoye obrazovaniye v vuzakh = Physical education in universities. 2013; 19(1): 105-115. (In Russ.)

14. Chirtsov A.S., Abutin M.V., Marek V.P., Mikushev S.V. New options for the use of information and multimedia technologies for the implementation of continuing higher professional education. Fizicheskoye obrazovaniye v vuzakh = Physical education in universities. 2012; 18(1): 109-125. (In Russ.)

15. Ashcroft B., McAlpine I. Student moderators in online discussions. In: R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, R. Phillips (Eds.) Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference Perth, 5-8 December. 2004. P. 88-94. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/ashcroft.html.

16. Allen B., Crosky A., McAlpine I., Hoffman M., Munroe P. ‘A blended approach to collaborative learning: Can it make large group teaching more student-centered?’ Proceedings of the 23rd annual ASCILITE Conference, ‘Who’s learning? Whose technology?’ University of Sydney; 2006. P. 33-42. [Internet]. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.123.611

17. Ulendeyeva N.I., Safronova I.A. Designing the electronic information and educational environment of the university: regulatory and organizational aspects. Vestnik Samarskogo yuridicheskogo instituta = Bulletin of the Samara Law Institute. 2017; 3 (25): 117-122. (In Russ.)

18. Beloshitskiy A.V., Meshcheryakov D.V., Falileyev V.YU. Information and educational environment of a military university, methodological aspects. Sovremennyye naukoyemkiye tekhnologii = Modern high technologies. 2015; 12-2: 284-287. (In Russ.)

19. Nazarov S.A. Pedagogical model of informationeducational environment of a technical university. Nauchnaya mysl’ Kavkaza = Scientific thought of the Caucasus. 2006; 2: 69-71. (In Russ.)

20. Prokhorenkov P.A. Stages of formation of the electronic information and educational environment of the university. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya = International Journal of Experimental Education. 2016; 2-2: 291-294. (In Russ.)

21. Kramarenko N.S., Kvashnin A.YU. Psychological and organizational aspects of the introduction of digital education, or how innovation can not be transformed into a “digital collective farm”. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta = Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. 2017; 4: 8. (In Russ.)

22. Serafimovich I.V., Kon’kova O.M. Promotion of professionalization through the organization of the scientific and educational environment of the university. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2017; 2: 29-39. (In Russ.)

23. Konkova O.M. Formation of students’ training and cognitive motivation. Akademiya pedagogicheskikh idey Novatsiya = Academy of Pedagogical Ideas Novation. 2018; 2: 34-47. (In Russ.)

24. Kashapov M.M., Serafimovich I.V., Poshekhonova Y.V. Components of metacognition and metacognitive properties of forecasting as determinants of supra-situational pedagogical thinking. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2017; 10 (1): 80-94.

25. Anofrikova N.S., Karyakin D.A. Distance Education System of SSU: Past, Present and Future. Informatsionnyye tekhnologii v obrazovanii: Materialy VII Vseros. nauchno-prakt. konf. = Information Technologies in Education: Materials VII Vseros. scientific and practical conf. Saratov: Nauka = Science; 2015: 452-455. (In Russ.)

26. Raykhlina A.V. I Innovations as a basis for interaction between the authorities and the university. Kontsept = Concept. 2016; 37: 114. (In Russ.)

27. Raykhlina A.V. The development of smart education as an element of building a knowledge economy in the region. Ekonomika i upravleniye: problemy, resheniya = Economics and Management: problems, solutions. 2017; 5: 199-204. (In Russ.)

28. Danchenok L.A., Nevostruyev P.YU. SMARTlearning: the basic principles of the organization of the educational process. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2014; 1: 70-74. (In Russ.)

29. Serafimovich I.V., Tattybayeva E.V. On the issue of promoting the professionalization of students at an economic university in the context of the implementation of new educational standards. Vozmozhnosti i perspektivy vysshego obrazovaniya: opyt razvitiya sovremennykh mnogoprofil’nykh vuzov. Materialy IKH Mezhdunarodnoy uchebnometodicheskoy konferentsii. Ed. A.YU. Aleksandrova, E.L. Nikolayeva = Opportunities and prospects for higher education: the experience of developing modern multi-disciplinary universities. Proceedings of the IX International Educational and Methodical Conference. Edited by A.Yu. Alexandrova, E.L. Nikolaev. 2017: 60-63. (In Russ.)