Development experience of information system for ranking of academic and pedagogical staff

Purpose of research. The aim of this work is research of algorithms for quantitative assessment of intellectual potential (rating) of academic and pedagogical staff in higher educational institutions, as well as the development of technology for the application of these algorithms in practice.

Materials and methods. According to the authors, the most appropriate method of assessing the diverse activities of the Faculty members is a technique based on the method of qualimetry – ranking objects in ascending or descending order based on the calculation of a certain set of features. This approach was embodied in the rules of rating of academic and pedagogical staff of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. Due to the fact that the indicators can change annually the possibility of dynamic adjustment of indicators was provided in the project implementation. An important factor affecting design decisions is the need to process a large number of indicators in a limited time. At the same time, the preparation of data (their input and control, coordination) should be engaged in a large number of people who are employees of different departments, geographically distributed, in different subordination. In addition, it was necessary to take into account the possibility of new requirements for output forms. As a result, the concept of an automated rating system of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics was based on the following design decisions: dynamic setting of indicators and algorithms of ranking, the dynamic configuration of the personal account of the rated academic and pedagogical staff, external configuring of control parameters, the possibility of creating extensible libraries of output forms, the use of Internet technologies.

Results. As a result of work the system of indicators of quantitative assessment, technology of their collecting and storage is prepared, and also the information system providing collecting, processing and display of the received results in an acceptable form on the basis of Internet technologies is realized. The technology of dynamic adjustment of the collected indicators, binding to the places of their formation, as well as setting the output forms has shown its effectiveness.

Conclusion. Experience in the implementation of the rating system in Plekhanov Russian University of Economics showed that the independent automated assessment of the activity efficiency of officers allows to improve the mechanism of planning and personnel management system, allows to create model of stimulation of the types of activity influencing increase of the place of University in the Russian and international ratings, and also creates conditions for positive dynamics of growth of level of qualification of academic and pedagogical staff. At the same time, rating enables employees to identify areas for development and improvement, influence their earnings and receive competitive remuneration for their work. Implementation of rating system in Plekhanov Russian University of Economics proved the flexibility of the proposed approach, reduction of labor costs for data processing, full transparency of calculations, and, as a consequence, reduction of questions from the rated academic and pedagogical staff. In addition, the directions of technological development of the system are identified.

1. Spivak V.A. Organizatsionnoye povedeniye i upravleniye personalom = Organizational behavior and personnel management. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2001. 416 p. (In Russ.)

2. SHekshnya S.V. Upravleniye personalom sovremennoy organizatsii = Personnel management of a modern organization. Moscow: Business School, Intel-Synthesis; 2002. 368 p. (In Russ.)

3. Ivantsevich Dzh., Lobanov A. A. Chelovecheskiye resursy upravleniya. Moscow: Delo; 1993. 88 p. (In Russ.)

4. Monden YA., Toyëota E. Metody effektivnogo upravleniya = Methods for effective management. Moscow: Economics; 1989. 151 p. (In Russ.)

5. Rak N.G. Methods of integrated personnel evaluation. Upravleniye personalom = Personnel Management. 2014; 3: 32-33. (In Russ.)

6. Zavarykina L.V., Lopatina A.S., Perfil’yeva O.V. Comparative analysis of international methodologies for ranking higher educational institutions. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy = Bulletin of international organizations. 2012; 1. (In Russ.)

7. Larionova. M.V. Methodology of comparative analysis of international approaches to the ranking of higher education institutions. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy = Bulletin of international organizations. 2012; 1. (In Russ.)

8. Van Vught F.A., Westerheijden D.F. Multidimensional Ranking: a new transparency tool for higher education and research. Higher Education Management and Policy. 2010; 22(3).

9. Kopylovich N.P., Arakelyan K.E. Employee motivation with front-office rating. Experience of «FORA-BANK». [Internet] Available from: http://www.hr-journal.ru/articles/mp/reytingovanie-frontofisov-opyt-fora-bank.html (In Russ.)

10. The rating system of employees as a tool to increase staff motivation [Internet]. Kadrovaya sluzhba i upravleniye personalom predpriyatiya = Human resources and enterprise personnel management. 2009; 2. Available from: https://hr-portal.ru/article/sistemareytingov-rabotnikov-kak-instrument-povysheniyamotivacii-personala (In Russ.)

11. Litvinov A. Sistema reytinga kak odna iz effektivnykh form motivatsii lineynogo personala na primere bankovskoy sfery = The rating system as one of the effective forms of motivation of line personnel on the example of the banking sector. [Internet] Available from: http://hr-media.ru/sistema-rejtinga-kak-odnaiz-effektivnyh-form-motivatsii-linejnogo-personalana-primere-bankovskoj-sfery/ (In Russ.)

12. Kostyukevich Z. Reyting i sistema otsenki personala = Rating and personnel evaluation system. [Internet] Available from: https://pandia.ru/text/78/309/2537.php (In Russ.)

13. Reyting sotrudnikov: motiviruyem, ispol’zuya vizualizatsiyu rezul’tatov personala = Employee rating: we motivate using visualization of staff results. [Internet] Available from: https://yaware.ru/blog/motivatsiya-reytingom-povyishaemproduktivnost-rabotyi-ispolzuya-vizualizatsiyurezultatov/ (In Russ.)

14. Metody i tseli otsenki personala: kak prevratit’ sotrudnikov iz instrumenta v mozgovoy tsentr kompanii = Methods and objectives of personnel assessment: how to turn employees from the tool into the brain center of the company. [Internet] Available from: https://www.kp.ru/guide/otsenka-personala.html (In Russ.)

15. Mishina E.A. Rating system of personnel assessment as a tool for motivating employees. Ekonomika i sovremennyy menedzhment: teoriya i praktika: sbornik statey po materialam XVIII mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii = Economics and modern management: theory and practice: a collection of articles based on the materials of the XVIII international scientific-practical conference. Novosibirsk: SibAK; 2012; 18. (In Russ.)

16. Metodologiya otsenki kompaniy i podscheta rezul’tatov = Methodology for evaluating companies and calculating results. [Internet] Available from: https://rating.hh.ru/methodology/ (In Russ.)

17. Reytingovaya attestatsiya personala = Rating certification of personnel. [Internet] Available from: https://www.cfin.ru/encycl/rating_attestation.shtml (In Russ.)

18. Kak postroit’ vnutrikorporativnyy reyting sotrudnikov? = How to build internal corporate rating of employees? [Internet] Available from: http://www.mainjob.ru/publications/?view=4505 (In Russ.)

19. Reytingovaya attestatsiya personala = Rating certification of personnel. [Internet] Available from: https://www.cfin.ru/encycl/rating_attestation.shtml (In Russ.)

20. M. Sorokin. Reytingovaya otsenka sotrudnikov i biznes-podrazdeleniy po metodu taynyy pokupatel’ = Rating assessment of employees and business units by the method of secret buyer. [Internet] Available from: http://www.mag-consulting.ru/asp/showarticle/437(In Russ.)

21. Metodiki otsenki personala = Methods of staff assessment. [Internet] Available from: https:// hrhelpline.ru/metody-i-metodiki-ocenki-personala/(In Russ.)

22. Reytingovaya attestatsiya personala = Rating certification of personnel. [Internet] Available from: http://producm.ru/the-economy-of-the-enterprise/terms/rating_attestation.php (In Russ.)

23. Personal’nyy reyting rabotnika = Personal rating of the employee. [Internet] Available from: http://docs.istina.msu.ru/ratings/main.html (In Russ.)

24. Saginova O. V., Kovaleva E. N. Ratings, the image of the university and the goals of higher education. Ekonomika obrazovaniya = Economics of Education. 2015; 1 (86): 12-23. (In Russ.)

25. Saginova O.V., Zav’yalova N.B., Grishina O.A., Skorobogatykh I.I. her rating as a tool for managing the human capital of a university, developing intercultural communications. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G.V. Plekhanova. Vstupleniye. Put’ v nauku. = Bulletin of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. Introduction. The path to science. 2015; 3-4 (12): 5-16. (In Russ.)

26. Saginova O.V., Grishina O.A., Skorobogatykh I.I. Individual rating of teachers as a marketing tool to improve the competitiveness of the university. Marketing i marketingovyye issledovaniya = Marketing and marketing research. 2015; 2: 114-127. (In Russ.)

27. Lukinova O.V., Pugachev A.V. Features of building profiles of security systems IP. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2015; 4 (111). (In Russ.)

28. S. Millet, P. T’yun. Predmetnooriyentirovannoye proyektirovaniye. Patterny, printsipy i metody. = Subject-oriented design. Patterns, principles and methods. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2017. 832 p. (In Russ.)

29. S. Stefanov. JavaScript. SHablony = Javascript. Templates. Tr. fr. Eng. Saint Petersburg: Symbol Plus; 2011. 272 p. (In Russ.)

30. Chernousov A.A. Automation of business processes in centers of excellence. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov KHIKH nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii Inzhiniring predpriyatiy i upravleniye znaniyami = The collection of scientific papers of the XIX scientific and practical conference Engineering Engineering and Knowledge Management. Moscow: 2016: 152-156. (In Russ.)