Information Management as a Factor in the Transition of the State from the Information Economy to the Digital Economy

The purpose of the article is to present the author’s approach to the study of information management when making managerial decisions by public administration bodies. In this paper, information management is consistently considered as an object, subject and method of information management. By the example of the content and correlation of such concepts as data and information, information and knowledge, the main obstacles to the transition of the state from the information economy to the digital economy are shown. The hypothesis is formulated that effective information management does not so much contribute to the formation of the added value of management processes, as it creates the potential for obtaining additional value of a management decision as an information product.

Materials and methods. The research is based on the analysis of the processes of informatization of society and the state, as well as the analysis of the possibilities of information management for building a digital infrastructure and effective interaction of the subjects of the digital economy. Various aspects of information management are disclosed in accordance with the “subject-object-subject” and “subject-object-object” models. The problems of determining the quantity and quality of information are revealed in comparison with the attributive, functional-cybernetic and semiotic concepts of information. The information base of the research was made up of the results of scientific research in the field of decision-making in public administration and methodological approaches to information management used in science.

Results. The main risks and problems of information management in decision-making by public administration bodies were identified. It is determined that knowledge becomes an economic resource not at the stage of its production, but at the stage of use. This resource allows you to create the added value of a management solution as an information product. It is proved that the role of the state in the dissemination and use of knowledge is provided by the unconditional desire of the individual to produce new knowledge. In addition, it is shown that for the transition to the digital economy, the state needs to create an information infrastructure in which openness and transparency of data are combined with equal opportunities for individuals in the economy (inclusive economy).

Conclusion. Information management is a significant factor in the transition of the state from an information economy to the digital one. The simple accumulation of information and knowledge cannot be a guide for the transition to the digital economy. Information management from the perspective of creating and using additional information value will avoid the risk of mechanical informatization and uncontrolled digitalization. The state activities in this direction should be responsible and consistent. The volume of information increases as a result of the individual’s desire to produce new knowledge, but the social value of knowledge increases as a result of the effective impact of the state on the development of information infrastructure and the diffusion of information technologies. Thus, the realization of the potential of the additional value of information and its scaling on the basis of state-supported platform tools will allow for the transition from the information economy to the digital economy.

1. Maslov K. The interaction of tax law and administrative law in regulation of information support of tax administration. System of Financial Law: System of Tax Law. Brno. 2015; 515: 322-328.

2. Bolvar M. P. R. Political factors for the adoption of different governance models in the provision of public services under Web 2.0 technologies. Social media: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Lecture notes in computer science. 2016: 9844: 607-618.

3. Liu S. M., Kim Y. Special issue on internet plus government: New opportunities to solve public problems? Government information quarterly. 2018; 35(1): 88-97.

4. Pelizza A., Hoppe R. Birth of a failure: consequences of framing ICT projects for the centralization of inter-departmental relations. Administration & Society. 2018; 50(1): 101-130.

5. Fedorowicz J., Sawyer S., Tomasino A. Governance configurations for inter-organizational coordination: A study of public safety networks. Journal of information technology. 2018; 33(4): 326-344.

6. Syuntyurenko O.V., Dmitrieva E.Y. The state system for scientific and technical information within the objectives of the digital economy. Scientific and technical information processing. 2019; 46(4): 288-297.

7. Utepbergenov I., Bobrov L., Medyankina I., Rodionova Z., Toibaeva, S. About the concept of information support system for innovative economy in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2019; 199: 515-526.

8. Bacior S., Gniadek J., Litwin U., Szewczyk R., Zygmunt M. Innovativeness of making spatial data available as an element of building an information society. World Multidisciplinary Earth Sciences Symposium (WMESS). IOP Conference series-earth and environmental science. 2018; 221: 012085.

9. Krishnan S., Teo T.S.H., Lymm J. Determinants of electronic participation and electronic government maturity: Insights from cross-country data. International Journal of Information Management. 2017; 37(4): 297-312.

10. Klievink B. Understanding public-private collaboration configurations for international information infrastructures. Electronic government (Egov 2015). 2015; 9248: 170-180.

11. An N. Research on government network image under the new era. Advances in Education Sciences. 2nd International conference on education and education research. 2015; 7: 3-7.

12. Krotkova E. V. Assessment of the information component of the region’s innovation infrastructure (experience of the republic of Tatarstan, the Russian Federation). Iioab Journal. 2018; 9: 216-220.

13. Suaiden E. The future of information systems in an open and transparent government environment. Ibersid-Revista de sistemas de informacion y documentacion. 2016; 10(2): 45-51.

14. Shrayberg Y. Information and document space in education, science and culture in the contemporary context of society digitalization. The annual paper presented at the Fifth World Professional Forum “Crimea-2019”. Nauchnye I tekhnicheskie biblioteki-scientific and technical libraries. 2019; 9: 3-55.

15. Faizrakhmanov R.A., Mylnikov L.A. The foundations of modeling management processes for innovation projects in production-economics systems. Automatic documentation and mathematical linguistics. 2016; 50(3): 84-90.

16. Penkova I.V., Korolev V.A., Butenko E.D., Glazkova I.Y., Eldarov S.K. Crypto Currencies as a modern financial tool of digital economy: global experience of state regulation. Perspectives on the use of new information and communication technology. 2019; 726: 326-334.

17. Olnes S., Jansen A. Blockchain technology as infrastructure in public sector - an analytical framework. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International conference on digital government research. 2018; a77: 657-666.

18. Ojo A., Adebayo S. Blockchain as a next generation government information infrastructure: a review of initiatives in D5 countries. Government 3.0 - Next Generation Government Technology Infrastructure and Services: Roadmaps, Enabling Technologies & Challenges. 2017; 32: 283-298.

19. Ben Sta H., Ben Rejeb A., Gattoufi S. Dealing with the imperfect data in «Smart-Cities». Electronic Government and Electronic Participation. 2016; 23: 211-221.

20. Arneson E., Deniz D., Javernick-Will A., Liel A., Dashti S. Information deficits and community disaster resilience. Natural Hazards Review. 2017; 18(4): 04017010.

21. Petrov L., Stoianov N., Tagarev T. Critical information infrastructure protection model and methodology, based on national and NATO study. Advances in dependability engineering of complex systems. 2018; 582: 350-357.

22. Mohammed S., Kamalrudin M., AlShami S.A., Hakimi H., Sidek S. Security readiness model of public organization in smart government: conceptual framework. Test engineering and management. 2020; 82: 12448-12456.

23. Lemke F., Taveter K., Erlenheim R., Pappel I., Draheim D., Janssen M. Stage models for moving from e-government to smart government. Springer. CCIS. 2020; 1135: 152-164.

24. Xie C.M. Research on integration of computer application technology and information management. 4th International workshop on materials engineering and computer sciences. IWMECS. 2019; 173-176.

25. Frolov A.L., Osinevich L.M., Feoktistova T.V., Efimova I.A. Digital economy and development of the state regulation system. Vision 2020: Sustainable economic development and application of innovation management. 2018; 5249-5255.

26. Ovrelid E., Bygstad B., Hanseth O. Establishing spaces of interplay: the role of discourse in the growth of information infrastructures. Iadis-International journal on computer science and information systems. 2016; 11(2): 31-45.

27. Krishnan S., Lymm J. Determinants of virtual social networks diffusion: Insights from cross-country data. Computers in human behavior. 2016; 54: 691-700.

28. Ignatiev M.B., Karlik A.E., Iakovleva E.A., Platonov V.V. Linguo-combinatorial model for diagnosing the state of human resources in the digital economy. Proceedings of 2018 Xvii Russian Scientific and Practical Conference on Planning and Teaching Engineering Staff for the Industrial and Economic Complex of the Region. 2019; 8604217: 201-204.

29. Qin Y.C., Ma L.L. The Economic Model and Government Functions in the Context of Big Data. Advances in Education Sciences. 2nd International Conference on Creative Education. 2015; 10: 451-459.

30. Klievink B., Bharosa N., Tan Y.H. The collaborative realization of public values and business goals: Governance and infrastructure of public-private information platforms. Government information quarterly. 2016; 33(1): 67-79.

31. Ogiela L., Ogiela M.R. Comparison of cognitive information systems supporting management tasks. International conference on intelligent networking and collaborative systems. IEEE Incos. 2015; 7312048: 49-56.

32. Miroyedov, A.A. Informatsionnoye obespecheniye mekhanizmov upravleniya regionom = Information support of regional management mechanisms. Moscow: Finance and Statistics; 2002. 128 p. (In Russ.)

33. Nikolakakou N., Bothos E., Mentzas G. A web-based information market to support policy decision making. Lecture notes in computer science. 2016; 9821: 153-161.

34. Apatova N.V., Boychenko O.V., Gerasimova S.V. Modeli i informatsionnyye sistemy sovremennoy ekonomiki = Models and information systems of the modern economy. Simferopol: DIAIPI; 2015. 557 p. (In Russ.)

35. North K. Wissensorientierte unternnehmensfuhrung-wertschopfung durch wissen. Gabler Verlag. 2; 2002. 378 p.

36. Mil’ner B.Z. Upravleniye znaniyami v innovatsionnoy ekonomike = Knowledge management in an innovative economy. Moscow: Economics; 2009. 648 p. (In Russ.)

37. Glaz’yev S.Yu. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya tekhnicheskogo razvitiya = Economic theory of technical development. Moscow: Science; 1990. 230 p. (In Russ.)

38. Glaz’yev S.Yu. Teoriya dolgosrochnogo tekhniko-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya = The theory of long-term technical and economic development. Moscow: VlaDar; 1993. 310 p. (In Russ.)

39. Sarychev Y. Information support is an integral part public administration systems: essence and meaning. Proceedings IEEE International conference on advanced trends in information theory. ATIT. 2019; 9030490: 214-217. (In Russ.)

40. Lutfullayev Kh.S., Irmatov M.I. Osnovy funktsionirovaniya ASOI organov gosudarstvennogo upravleniya = Fundamentals of ASOI functioning of government bodies. Tashkent: Fan; 1979. 116 p.

41. Mil’ner B.Z. Innovatsionnoye razvitiye: ekonomika, intellektual’nyye resursy, upravleniye znaniyami = Innovative development: economics, intellectual resources, knowledge management. Moscow: Infra-M; 2010. 624 p. (In Russ.)

42. Denisov V.V. Informatsionnyye sistemy i tekhnologii: analiz i sovershenstvovaniye = Information systems and technologies: analysis and improvement. Novosibirsk: Publishing house of NSTU; 2015. 176 p. (In Russ.)

43. Kolov Yu.N. Teoriya i metodologiya issledovaniya smeshannoy ekonomiki i yeye evolyutsii = Theory and methodology of the study of the mixed economy and its evolution. Asinovskoye: Asino; 2009. 451 p. (In Russ.)

44. Grinberg R.S., Rubinshteyn A.YA. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiodinamika = Economic sociodynamics. Moscow: ISE-PRESS; 2000. 278 p. (In Russ.)