Preview

Open Education

Advanced search

Optimal Poisson Cognitive System with Markov Learning Model

https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2021-6-45-52

Abstract

The aim of the study is to develop a mathematical model of the trained Markov cognitive system in the presence of discrete training and interfering random stimuli arising at random times at its input. The research method consists in the application of the simplest Markov learning model of Estes with a stochastic matrix with two states, in which the transition probabilities are calculated in accordance with the optimal Neуman-Pearson algorithm for detecting stimuli affecting the system. The paper proposes a model of the random appearance of images at the input of the cognitive system (in terms of learning theory, these are stimuli to which the system reacts). The model assumes an exponential distribution of the system’s response time to stimuli that is widely used to describe intellectual work, while their number is distributed according to the Poisson law. It is assumed that the cognitive system makes a decision about the presence or absence of a stimulus at its input in accordance with the Neуman-Pearson optimality criterion, i.e. maximizes the probability of correct detection of the stimulus with a fixed probability of false detection. The probabilities calculated in this way are accepted as transition probabilities in the stochastic learning matrix of the system. Thus, the following assumptions are accepted in the work, apparently corresponding to the behavior of the system assuming human reactions, i.e. the cognitive system.
The images analyzed by the system arise at random moments of time, while the duration of time between neighboring appearances of images is distributed exponentially.
The system analyzes the resulting images and makes a decision about the presence or absence of an image at its input in accordance with the optimal Neуman-Pearson algorithm that maximizes the probability of correct identification of the image with a fixed probability of false identification.
The system is trainable in the sense that decisions about the presence or absence of an image are made sequentially on a set of identical situations, and the probability of making a decision depends on the previous decision of the system.
The new results of the study are analytical expressions for the probabilities of the system staying in each of the possible states, depending on the number of steps of the learning process and the intensities of useful and interfering stimuli at the input of the system. These probabilities are calculated for an interesting case in which the discreteness of the appearance of stimuli in time is clearly manifested and the corresponding graphs are given. Stationary probabilities are also calculated, i.e. for an infinite number of training steps, the probabilities of the system staying in each of the states and the corresponding graph is presented.
In conclusion, it is noted that the presented graphs of the behavior of the trained system correspond to an intuitive idea of the reaction of the cognitive system to the appearance of stimuli. Some possible directions of further research on the topic mentioned in the paper are indicated.

About the Author

A. A. Solodov
Kosygin Russian State University
Russian Federation

Aleksander A. Solodov, Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Professor, Professor of the Department of Applied Mathematics and Programming

Moscow



References

1. Lapayeva L.G., Bychenkov O.A., Rogatkin D.A. Neurobiology, conceptual categories of language and an elementary model of the robot world. Pyatnadtsataya natsional’naya konferentsiya po iskusstvennomu intellektu s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem KII 2016 (3–7 oktyabrya 2016, Smolensk). Trudy konferentsii. T. 2. = Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence with International Participation KII 2016 (October 3–7, 2016, Smolensk). Conference proceedings. T. 2. Smolensk: Universum; 2016: 292–300. (In Russ.)

2. Chudova N.V. Conceptual description of the picture of the world in the tasks of modeling behavior. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i prinyatiye resheniy = Artificial intelligence and decision making. 2012; 2. (In Russ.)

3. Rybina G.V., Parondzhanov S.S. Tekhnologiya postroyeniya dinamicheskikh intellektual’nykh system = Technology for building dynamic intelligent systems. Moscow: NIYAUMIFI; 2011. 240 p. (In Russ.)

4. Kuznetsov O.P. Cognitive semantics and artificial intelligence. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i prinyatiye resheniy = Artificial intelligence and decision making. 2012; 4: 32-42. (In Russ.)

5. Trembach V.M. Cognitive approach to the creation of intellectual modules of organizational and technical systems. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open education. 2017; 2: 78–87. (In Russ.)

6. Rogatkin D.A., Kulikov D.A., Ivliyeva A.L. Three views on modern neuroscience data in the interests of intelligent robotics. Modeling of Artificial Intelligence = Modeling of Artificial Intelligence. 2015; 6: 2. (In Russ.)

7. Val’kman YU.R. Cognitive semiotics: gestalts and signs, integrity and structure. Sbornik trudov XV Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Iskusstvennyy intellekt (KII-2016)». (Oktyabr’ 2016. Smolensk). T.2. = Proceedings of the XV International Conference “Artificial Intelligence (CII-2016)”. (October 2016. Smolensk). T.2. Smolensk: 2016: 250-258. (In Russ.)

8. Lakoff D. Zhenshchiny, ogon’ i opasnyye veshchi: Chto kategorii yazyka govoryat nam o myshlenii = Women, fire and dangerous things: What the categories of language tell us about thinking. Moscow: Yaz. Slavs. Culture; 2004. 792 p. (In Russ.)

9. Trembach V.M. Intelligent system using concept representations for solving the tasks of purposeful behavior. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open education. 2018; 22; 1: 28-37. (In Russ.)

10. Trembach V.M. Resheniye zadach upravleniya v organizatsionno-tekhnicheskikh sistemakh s ispol’zovaniyem evolyutsioniruyushchikh znaniy = Solving management problems in organizational and technical systems using evolving knowledge. Moscow: MESI; 2010. 236 p. (In Russ.)

11. Satton R.S., Barto E.G. Obucheniye s podkrepleniyem. per. s angl = Reinforcement learning. Tr. from Eng. Moscow: BINOM. Knowledge Laboratory; 2011. 399 p. (In Russ.)

12. Gavrilova T. A., Kudryavtsev D. V., Muromtsev D. I. Inzheneriya znaniy. Modeli i metody = Engineering knowledge. Models and methods. Saint Petersburg: Lan; 2016. 324 p. (In Russ.)

13. Rybina G.V. Osnovy postroyeniya intellektual’nykh system = The basics of building intelligent systems. Moscow: Finance and Statistics; 2010. 432 p. (In Russ.)

14. Trembach V.M. Multi-agent system for solving the problem of purposeful behavior. Chetyrnadtsataya natsional’naya konferentsiya po iskusstvennomu intellektu s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem KII 2014 (24–27sentyabrya 2014. Kazan’). Trudy konferentsii. T. 1 = Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence with International Participation KII 2014 (September 24–27, 2014. Kazan). Conference proceedings. T. 1. Kazan: RIC “School”; 2014: 344–353. (In Russ.)

15. Tel’nov YU.F. Model of a multi-agent system for the implementation of information and educational space. Chetyrnadtsataya natsional’naya konferentsiya po iskusstvennomu intellektu s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem KII-2014 (24-27 sentyabrya 2014. Kazan’). Trudy konferentsii. T. 1 = Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence with International Participation KII-2014 (September 2427, 2014. Kazan). Conference proceedings. T. 1. Kazan: RIC “School”; 2014: 334–3435. (In Russ.)

16. Rosch E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1975; 104: 192–233.

17. Lakoff J. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.

18. Solodov A.A Mathematical formalization and algorithmization of the main modules of organizational and technical systems. Statistika i Ekonomika = Statistics and Economics. 2020; 17; 4: 96-104. (In Russ.)

19. Estes W.K., Burke C.J. Application of a statistical model to simple discrimination learning in human subjects. Jorn. Exp. Psychol. 1955; 50: 81-88.

20. Kemeni Dzh., Snell Dzh., Tompson Dzh. Vvedeniye v konechnuyu matematiku. Per. s angl. = Introduction to Finite Mathematics. Tr. from Eng. Moscow: Foreign Literature Publishing House; 1963. 486 p. (In Russ.)

21. Solodov A.A. Markov model of representation of sensory images for the formation of a model of the external world. Statistika i Ekonomika = Statistics and Economics. 2018; 15; 5: 81-88. (In Russ.)

22. Solodov A.A. Statistical analysis of the mechanism for the formation of concept-representations in organizational and technical systems. Statistika i Ekonomika = Statistics and Economics. 2018; 15; 4: 70-76. (In Russ.)

23. Van Tris G. Teoriya obnaruzheniya, otsenok i modulyatsii = Theory of detection, estimation and modulation. Moscow: Soviet radio; 1972. 744 p. (In Russ.)

24. Tikhonov V.I., Mironov M.A. Markovskiye protsessy = Markov processes. Moscow: Soviet radio; 1977. 488 p. (In Russ.)

25. Tikhonov. V.I., Kul’man N.K. Nelineynaya fil’tratsiya i kvazikogerentnyy priyem signalov = Nonlinear filtering and quasi-coherent signal reception. Moscow: Soviet radio; 1975. 704 p. (In Russ.)

26. Solodov A.A., Analysis of the dynamic characteristics of random influences in cognitive systems. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open education. 2017; 21; 1: 4-13. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Solodov A.A. Optimal Poisson Cognitive System with Markov Learning Model. Open Education. 2021;25(6):45-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2021-6-45-52

Views: 426


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-4243 (Print)
ISSN 2079-5939 (Online)