Analysis and Justification of the Effect of Digital Transformation of Enterprises and Organizations

The purpose of the study. The article is devoted to the analysis and justification of the effect of digital transformation of enterprises based on the development of effective business models that support modern digital technologies and ensure increased labour productivity. A critical analysis of the impact of digitalization on business efficiency has been carried out. It is shown that the introduction of modern digital technologies does not automatically increase the efficiency of companies, but it is necessary to carry out changes within the company as part of new business models. An urgent task is set to investigate the models of changes in organizational and economic relations at enterprises as a result of the adaptation of the principles and methods of Scientific Organization of Labour (SOL) in relation to new digital technologies.

Materials and methods of research. The article provides an analytical review of a large number of publications devoted to substantiating the effect of digital transformation of enterprises and organizations. As research methods, the analysis of complex changes in the mechanisms of coordination of performers of business processes, redistribution of their functions, and modification of the organizational structure of the enterprise based on the method of Scientific Organization of Labour is proposed. The use of a combination of these methods will allow the implementation of corporate information systems in accordance with a business model adequate to the conditions of the enterprise, taking into account the principles and methods of Scientific Organization of Labour.

Results. It is proposed to separate the external and internal aspects of the digital transformation of the enterprise. As an external aspect, the influence of digital technologies on changing business models is justified from the point of view of a new business strategy. As an internal aspect, it is proposed to consider the change in organizational and economic relations of employees of enterprises in production and business processes, taking into account the principles and methods of Scientific Organization of Labour.

Conclusion. The novelty of the research lies in the substantiation of the effect of digital transformation of the enterprise based on the development of principles and methods of Scientific Organization of Labour (SOL); in the systematic consideration of the concept of digital transformation, in which the condition of necessity is the use of adequate digital technologies in the business processes of the enterprise, and the condition of sufficiency is a change in organizational and economic relations within the framework of the business models being implemented. As a recommendation, the need to include research on the adaptation of methods of Scientific Organization of Labour in relation to the digital transformation of domestic enterprises and organizations in national technological initiatives is justified. These studies should be based on the achievements of the Russian scientific school in the fields of system analysis, cybernetics and computer science.

1. Lugachev M.I., Skripkin K.G. Information revolution: economic aspect. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika = Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 6. Economy. 2019; 6: 20-38. (In Russ.)

2. Tkachenko A.A. Essence and types of socioeconomic relations. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal kontsept. = Scientific and methodological electronic journal concept 2016; 17: 42-46. (In Russ.)

3. Sovmestnoye zasedaniye Gossoveta i Soveta po strategicheskomu razvitiyu i natsproyektam = Joint meeting of the State Council and the Council for Strategic Development and National Projects [Internet]. kremlin.ru. 2020. Available from: http://government.ru/news/41203/. (cited 23.12.2021). (In Russ.)

4. Krishnаn M., Misсhkе J., Rеmеs J. Is thе sоlоw раrаdоx bасk? [Internet]. MсKinsеy Quаrtеrly. 2018. Available from: www.mсkinsеy.соm/businеssfunсtiоns/mсkinsеy-digitаl/оur-insights/is-thеsоlоw-раrаdоx-bасk. (cited 28.06.22).

5. Sсhwеikl S., Оbеrmаiеr R. LеssоnsFrоmThrееDесаdеsОfIT рrоduсtivity rеsеаrсh. Mаnаgеmеnt Rеviеw Quаrtеrly. 2020; 70; 1: 507.

6. Sоlоw R. Wе’d Bеttеr Wаtсh Оut. Thе Nеw Yоrk Timеs. Bооk Rеviеw оf thе Myth оf thе РоstIndustriаl Есоnоmy; 1987.

7. dе Саlаn J., Саuсhаrd J. Rеmèdе соntrе l’hystériе numériquе. R. Lаffоnt S.А.S., 2019. 211 с.

8. Gоrdоn R. Thе Risе аnd Fаll оf Аmеriсаn Grоwth. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2016. 237 p.

9. Chernyakov A. Economic development of the USA in the 1920s. The era of prosperity [Internet]. Istoriya SSHA. Materialy k kursu = History of the USA. Materials for the course.. Available from: https://ushistory.ru/populjarnaja-literatura/468-ekonomicheskoe-razvitie-ssha-v-1920-e-gg-epohaprotsvetanija. 2010. (cited 15.05.2022). (In Russ.)

10. GOST 23004-78 G. Mekhanizatsiya i avtomatizatsiya tekhnologicheskikh protsessov v mashinostroyenii i priborostroyenii. Osnovnyye terminy, opredeleniya i oboznacheniya = GOST 23004-78 G. Mechanization and automation of technological processes in mechanical engineering and instrument making. Basic terms, definitions and designations. Moscow: Gosstandart; 29 p. (In Russ.)

11. Goldratt E., Ptak K., Shragenkhaym,E. Tsel’ 3. Neobkhodimo, no ne dostatochno = Goal 3. Necessary but not sufficient. 2000. 244 p. (In Russ.)

12. Khiks D. Theory of economic history. Voprosy ekonomiki = Questions of Economics. 2006. 224 p. (In Russ.)

13. Sellen A., Harrer K. The Myth of the Rarerless Offise. Cambridge: MIT Rress; 2003.

14. Fedorov I. G. Complex transformation of the enterprise during the transition to process management. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open education. 2015; 6(113): 52-59. (In Russ.)

15. Kаrr N. Dоеs IT Mаttеr? Infоrmаtiоn Tесhnоlоgy аnd thе Соrrоsiоn оf Соmреtitivе Аdvаntаgе. Hаrvаrd: Hаrvаrd Businеss Rеviеw; 2003.

16. Brynjоlfssоn Е., Hitt L., Yаng S. Intаngiblе Аssеts: Соmрutеrs аnd Оrgаnizаtiоnаl Сарitаl.Проблемы информатизации экономики и управления 68 Открытое образование  Т. 26. № 5. 2022 Brооkings Рареrs оn Есоnоmiс Асtivity: Mасrоесоnоmiсs. 2002; 2; 1: 137-199.

17. Lugachev M.I., Skripkin K.G., Anan’in V.I., Zimin K.V. Effektivnost’ investitsiy v IT. IT investment efficiency. Almanac of the best works [Internet]. IT-Value.RU. 2014. Available from: httr://it-value.rostash.io/rost/yeffektivnostinvestitsii-v-it-almanakh-lushshikh-rabot. (cited 20.08.2022). (In Russ.)

18. Lugachev M.I. Continued research on the Solow paradox. Conclusions for Russia [Internet]. Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet MGU, seminar po Tsifrovym tekhnologiyam = Faculty of Economics, Moscow State University, seminar on Digital Technologies. Available from: httrs://www.yeson.msu.ru/sys/raw.rhr?o=66658&r=attashment. (cited 22.08.2022). (In Russ.)

19. Orlova Yu.A., Zubarev Yu.A. Sovremennyye kontseptsii upravleniya predpriyatiyem = Modern concepts of enterprise management. Moscow: Bibkom; 2010. 321 p. (In Russ.)

20. O’Del., Grayson. If Only We Knew What We Know. Salifornia management review. 1998; 20: 3.

21. Sonsulting A.R. 2013 YeRR Rerort: Organizational shange and business rrosess management. Solutions Researsh Rerort 2013.

22. Stolterman Ye., Fors S. Information Teshnology and the Good Life. In: Information systems researsh: relevant theory and informed rrastise. Kluwer asademis rublishers. 2004: 687-693.

23. Rublov S. Lyubimyy priyem IT-makhinatorov v SSHA — poddelka finansovoy otchetnosti = The favorite technique of IT scammers in the USA is the forgery of financial statements [Internet]. Lenta.ru. 2005. Available from: httrs://lenta.ru/artisles/2005/01/28/dotsom/ (cited 17.05.2022). (In Russ.)

24. Puzyr’ NASDAQ = NASDAQ bubble. Kommersant Business Guide. No. 32, February 28, 2008, pp. 32-32. (In Russ.)

25. Spens M. Paradoks avtomatizatsii: pochemu ne rastet proizvoditel’nost’ truda = Paradox of automation: why labor productivity does not grow [Internet]. FORBES. 2015. Available from: httr://forbes.net.ua/magazine/forbes/1403055-raradoksavtomatizasii-roshemu-ne-rastet-rroizvoditelnosttruda. (In Russ.)

26. Justise S. Ready, Set, Fail? Avoiding setbasks in the intelligent automation rase [Internet]. KRMG.som. 2018. Available from: httrs://home.krmg/us/yen/home/insights/2018/11/2018-issue4-artisle2.html. (cited 01.08.2022).

27. Borisyak D., Kantyshev P. Borisyak, D., Kantyshev, P., Gref priznal neeffektivnost’ novoy IT-platformy Sberbanka = Gref recognized the inefficiency of the new IT platform of Sberbank. Vedomosti. No. 3995 dated 01/18/2016. (In Russ.)

28. Demchenko N., Litova Ye. Gref priznal poteryu milliardov rubley iz-za iskusstvennogo intellekta = Gref acknowledged the loss of billions of rubles due to artificial intelligence [Internet]. Rosbizneskonsalting. 2019. Available from: httrs://www.rbs.ru/finanses/26/02/2019/5s74f4839a7947501397823f. (cited 20.07.2022). (In Russ.)

29. Yerzhenin R. Some approaches to describing the efficiency model of public management services. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov XXII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii inzhiniring predpriyatiy i upravleniye znaniyami (IP&UZ-2020) = Collection of scientific papers of the XXII International Scientific Conference Enterprise Engineering and Knowledge Management (IP&UZ-2020). Moscow: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics; 2021: 58-68. (In Russ.)

30. Criminal cases in the Russian information technology market [Internet]. Gosudarstvo Biznes Tekhnologii = State Business Technologies. Available from: https://www.tadviser.ru/index.php/Stat’ya:Ugolovnyye_dela_na_rynke_informatsionnykh_tekhnologiy_Rossii. (cited 15.01.2022). (In Russ.)

31. Osterval’der A., Pin’ye I. Postroyeniye biznes-modeley = Construction of business models. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2013. 290 p. (In Russ.)

32. Brynjolfsson Ye., Mendelson H. Information Systems and the Organization of Modern Yenterrrise. Journal of Organizational Somruting. 1993: 245-255.

33. Shvab K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya = The fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: Eksmo; 2016. 138 p. (In Russ.)

34. Mintsberg G. Struktura v kulake: sozdaniye effektivnoy organizatsii = Structure in the fist: the creation of an effective organization. Tr. from Eng. YU.N. Kapturevskogo. Saint Petersburg: Peter; 2004. (In Russ.)

35. Bogdanov A. A. Tektologiya – Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka = Tectology - General organizational science. Moscow: Institute of Economics RAS, Institute for System Research RAS; 1989. 312 p. (In Russ.)

36. Yermanskiy O.A. Nauchnaya organizatsiya truda i proizvodstva i sistema Teylora = Scientific organization of labor and production and the Taylor system. Moscow: State publishing house; 1925. 380 p. (In Russ.)

37. Gastev A.K. Kak nado rabotat’ = How to work. Moscow: Central Institute of Labor; 1922. (In Russ.)

38. Levashkin S.P. Kolmogorov and modern informatics. Matematicheskoye obrazovaniye = Mathematical education. 2020; 96; 4: 42-64. (In Russ.)

39. Kas’yanov V.N., Marchuk A.G. Scientific school of A.P. Ershov: programming systems and informatics. Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya, posvyashchennaya 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya chlena-korrespondenta AN SSSR Alekseya Andreyevicha Lyapunova, Sovremennyye problemy matematiki, informatiki i bioinformatiki = International conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of Corresponding Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences Alexei Andreevich Lyapunov, Modern problems of mathematics, informatics and bioinformaticsProblems of Informatization of Economics and Management Open education  V. 26. № 5. 2022 69 (Novosibirsk, October 11–14, 2011). Novosibirsk: Institute of Computational Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2011: 87-88. (In Russ.)

40. Grinchenko T.A., Strogniy A.A. S. Viktor Mikhailovich Glushkov and his school. Matematicheskiye mashiny i sistemy = Mathematical machines and systems. 2006: 4. (In Russ.)