Preview

Open Education

Advanced search

Preparation for Entering a Higher Educational Institution as an Investment Project

https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2023-1-36-50

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to develop an algorithm for managing investments in preparation for entering a higher educational institution as an investment project.
Materials and methods. The study includes a review of bibliographic sources on the existing methods and approaches to determining the economic efficiency of preparing for admission to a higher educational institution, as well as methods for assessing the effectiveness of investment projects. It also includes the collection and analysis of a statistical set of data and the development of a mechanism for choosing a training method with the available data about the applicant through neural network modeling.
Results. A number of factors influencing the effectiveness of preparing an applicant for admission are considered. The effectiveness of the main trajectories of preparation for admission is evaluated by modeling the results of the collected statistical population, in particular: school preparation, tutoring, additional courses. Neural network models are created to determine the relationship between the factors influencing the result of preparation for admission and to make a choice to determine the significance of the applicant’s input parameters for various training trajectories. In accordance with the selected data, a neural network model is being developed to select the optimal trajectory for preparing for admission to a higher educational institution. As a result of creating a neural network model, a mathematical model is designed to determine the most optimal training method. Preparation for admission is considered as an investment project. By applying the method of evaluating the effectiveness of an investment project and the approach to managing it, based on the created model, an algorithm is described for choosing the best trajectory for preparing for admission to a higher educational institution, which allows applicants to independently evaluate investments in training as an investment project and choose the most cost-effective way of training. By adapting the method of assessing the economic efficiency of investments by discounting cash flows used in the business environment, a methodology was formulated for choosing the most optimal training trajectory.
Conclusion. It can be argued that it makes sense to consider investments in additional preparation for a high school student to enter a higher educational institution as an investment project in which the parent acts as an investor, and the goal of the project is to enter a higher educational institution. To assess the effectiveness of investments in training and competent management of them, an algorithm has been developed for choosing the most cost-effective trajectory of preparation for entering a higher educational institution, using the example of admission to the Perm State National Research University. The algorithm is based on a neural network model that takes into account the input parameters of students: the duration of training, the frequency of additional classes, the level of motivation and average performance as factors influencing the probability of entering a higher educational institution. The algorithm is designed and can be used to manage investments in additional education of the child by determining the most cost-effective way to use financial resources. It is expedient to use the developed algorithm in those cases when the final goal involves the admission of a child to an educational institution. In this case, the use of the model will offer the best training path from an economic point of view for a particular applicant, taking into account the input parameters.

About the Authors

V. A. Kataeva
Perm State National Research University
Russian Federation

Vasilina A. Kataeva

Perm



V. R. Masalkina
Perm State National Research University
Russian Federation

Vladislava R. Masalkina

Perm



A. A. Ponomareva
Perm State National Research University
Russian Federation

Anastasiya Ponomareva

Perm



References

1. Pak V.D., Nuzhina N.I. What is a project? Definition and features. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy zhurnal = International research journal. 2013; 8(3): 133-134. (In Russ.)

2. Federal’nyy zakon ot 25.02.1999 No 39-FZ (red. ot 14.03.2022) «Ob investitsionnoy deyatel’nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii, osushchestvlyayemoy v forme kapital’nykh vlozheniy» = Federal Law No. 39-FZ of February 25, 1999 (as amended on March 14, 2022) “On investment activities in the Russian Federation carried out in the form of capital investments”. (In Russ.)

3. Prokoshina I.O. Management of investment projects. Molodoy uchenyy = Young scientist. 2018; 48(234): 413-415. (In Russ.)

4. Prakhov I.A. Dynamics of investments and return on additional preparation for admission to a university. Prikladnaya ekonometrika = Applied Econometrics. 2015; 1(37): 107-124. (In Russ.)

5. Mark Brey. Private additional education (tutoring): a comparative analysis of models and consequences. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Issues. 2007; 1: 65-84. (In Russ.)

6. Loyalka P.K, Zakharov A.B. Does shadows education help students prepare for college? International Journal of Educational Development. 2016; 49: 22-30.

7. Nuriyeva L.M., Kiselev S.G. Say a word about the poor tutor (once again about the effectiveness of tutoring for preparing for the Unified State Examination. Obrazovaniye i nauka = Education and Science. 2018; 20; 8: 143-163. (In Russ.)

8. Drobysheva V.V. Evaluation of the effectiveness of investments in education as a significant element of the life quality management system. Vestnik TGU = Bulletin of TSU. 2009; 7: 93-99. (In Russ.)

9. Andrushchak G.V., Natkhov T.V. Introduction to the Unified State Examination, Applicant Strategies and the Accessibility of Higher Education. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Questions of Education. 2012; 3: 64-86. (In Russ.)

10. Sannikov D.A. Tutoring as a kind of pedagogical activity. Izvestiya rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena = Proceedings of the Russian State University. A.I. Herzen. 2021; 199: 189-195. (In Russ.)

11. Lobacheva V.I. Psychological factors influencing the preparation of schoolchildren for the unified state exam. Kant = Kant. 2017; 4(25): 72-75. (In Russ.)

12. Chernyavskaya V.S., Merkulov D.S. The relationship between the results of the USE and the success of the educational activities of school graduates. Sovremennyye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem = Modern studies of social problems. 2015; 6: 290-300. (In Russ.)

13. Tsentral’nyy bank RF= Central Bank of the Russian Federation [Internet]. Official site. Available from: https://cbr.ru/. (cited 17.05.22). (In Russ.)

14. PGNIU = PSNIU [Internet].Official site. Available from: http://www.psu.ru/. (cited 17.05.22). (In Russ.)

15. MGIMO = MGIMO [Internet]. Official site. Available from: https://mgimo.ru/. (cited 17.05.22). (In Russ.)

16. SPbGU = St. Petersburg State University [Internet]. Official site. Available from: https://spb.postupi.online/vuz/spbgu/. (cited 17.05.22). (In Russ.)

17. NIU VSHE = NRU HSE [Internet]. Official site. Available from: https://www.hse.ru/. (cited 17.05.22). (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Kataeva V.A., Masalkina V.R., Ponomareva A.A. Preparation for Entering a Higher Educational Institution as an Investment Project. Open Education. 2023;27(1):36-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2023-1-36-50

Views: 484


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-4243 (Print)
ISSN 2079-5939 (Online)