A Meta-Analysis of Relationship Between Teachers’ Personnel Characteristics and Academic Results of Students
https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2026-1-77-87
Abstract
Purpose of the research. To conduct a meta-analysis to identify and systematize the relationships between key teachers’ personnel characteristics (professional competence, motivation, psychological climate, participation in further professional education, and others) and academic results of students.
Materials and methods. The meta-analysis included 35 scientific articles published between 2019 and 2025, selected from Russian and international electronic bibliometric databases. The selection criteria were relevance to the topic, the presence of an empirical sample, and quantitative results. We used content analysis and comparative analysis methods to systematize the data, summarizing the findings in thematic summary tables.
Results. The analysis established that the greatest influence on student academic achievement comes from a teacher’s professional competence (high correlations r = 0.675 – 0.89), their intrinsic motivation and job satisfaction (β = 0.34 –12.56; r = 0.88 – 0.94), and the quality of the teacher-student relationship (moderate to high correlations r = 0.41 – 0.725). Systematic further professional education shows a consistent positive association with academic performance (r = 0.678; β = 0.31). The influence of factors such as gender matching, salary, and length of service proved weak or statistically insignificant and highly context-dependent.
Conclusion. The meta-analysis results confirm that educational effectiveness is largely determined by a complex of a teacher’s psychological, pedagogical, and personal characteristics, rather than by their formal parameters alone. The most effective directions for educational policy are investing in competence development, supporting motivation and a positive psychological climate, and creating systems for teachers’ continuous professional development.
About the Authors
Elena Yu. PetryaevaRussian Federation
Elena Y. Petryaeva, Cand. Sci. (Pedagogic), Head of the Center for Analytical Research and Modeling in Education at the Research Institute of Urban Studies and Global Education,
Moscow.
Yulia I. Sumenkova
Russian Federation
Julia I. Sumenkova, Junior Researcher at the Center for Analytical Research and Modeling in Education of the Research Institute of Urban Studies and Global Education,
Moscow.
Maria N. Fedorovskaya
Russian Federation
Maria N. Fedorovskaya, Junior Researcher at the Center for Analytical Research and Modeling in Education of the Research Institute of Urban Studies and Global Education,
Moscow.
References
1. Morosanova V.I., Fomina T.G., Filippova Ye.V. Conscious self-regulation, school engagement, and teaching quality as resources for subjective well-being and academic performance of students. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya = Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14: Psychology. 2025; 48; 1: 55–77. DOI: 10.11621/LPJ-25-03. (In Russ.)
2. Ahmed A.M., Worku, B.N., Ayane, Z.N. Enhancing teachers’ professional competence through licensure tests and intervention: a study on teacher competence and student academic performance in Ethiopia. Discov Educ. 2025; 4; 1: 322. DOI: 10.1007/s44217-025-00561-z.
3. Pamon E., Oco R. Teachers’ Competence and Learners’ Academic Performance. International journal of multidisciplinary research and analysis. 2024; 7:3. DOI: 10.47191/ijmra/v7-i03-63.
4. Filatov A.V. Identifying criteria for teacher effectiveness as a factor in improving the quality of education at school. Obrazovaniye, professional’noye razvitiye i sokhraneniye zdorov’ya uchitelya v XXI veke = Education, professional development, and maintaining teacher health in the 21st century. Kazan: Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University. 2022: 414–419. (In Russ.)
5. Engida M.A, Iyasu A.S, Fentie Y.M Impact of teaching quality on student achievement: student evidence. Frontiers in Education. 2024; 9: 136–317. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1367317.
6. Gasinets M.V., Kapuza A.V., Dobryakova M.S. Teachers’ Agency in Shaping Schoolchildren’s Academic Success: Roles and Beliefs. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2022; 1: 75–97. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-1-75-97. (In Russ.)
7. Matveyeva N.A., Kulish V.V., Lazarenko I.R. The Impact of the Quality of Teacher’s Pedagogical Education on the Learning Outcomes of School Graduates. Science for Education Today = Science for Education Today. 2020; 10; 4: 156–173. DOI 10.15293/2658-6762.2004.10. (In Russ.)
8. Francisco Ch., Celon L. Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Its Effects on Students’ Academic Performance. Online Submission. 2020; 6; 7: 64–71.
9. Francisco A. Teachers’ Personal and Professional Demographic Characteristics as Predictors of Students’ Academic Performance in English. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences. 2020; 5; 2: 80–91. DOI: 10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0105.
10. Akram M. Relationship between Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness and Student Achievement at Secondary School Level [Internet]. Bulletin of Education and Research. 2019; 41; 2: 93–108. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1229453.pdf.
11. Fauth B. Decristan J., Decker A.-T., Büttner G., Hardy I., Klieme E., Kunter M. The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2019; 86: 102882. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882.
12. Ezugwu I., Dadzie J., Ocheni Ch. Enhancing students’ academic achievement in basic science: the role of assessment for learning, classroom management, and teacher-student relationships. European Journal of Education Studies. 2024; 11: 196–214. DOI: 10.46827/ejes.v11i5.5298.
13. Nazish A., Kang M. Exploring the Positive Teacher-Student Relationship on Students’ Motivation and Academic Performance in Secondary Schools in Karachi. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review. 2024; 4: 149–159. DOI: 10.48112/aessr.v4i2.710.
14. Sankalaite S, Huizinga M, Warreyn P, Dewandeleer J., Baeyens D. The association between working memory, teacher-student relationship, and academic performance in primary school children. Front. Psychol. 2023; 14: 1240741. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240741.
15. Lei H., Wang X., Chiu M. M., Du M., Xie T. Teacher-student relationship and academic achievement in China: Evidence from a three-level meta-analysis. School Psychology International. 2023; 44(1): 68–101. DOI: 10.1177/01430343221122453.
16. Nonyelum D., Ogugua K. Abah J. Influence of Student-Teacher Relationship on the Academic Performance of Junior Secondary School Students in Mathematics in Makurdi Local Government Area of Benue State, Nigeria. VillageMath Educational Review. 2022; 3; 1: 26–52. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5817149.
17. Olarewaju Ya., Kayode E. Obafemi K., Ganiyu Akanbi Yu. Teacher-Pupil-Relationship as Correlates of Pupils’ Academic Pertformance in Numeracy in Moro Local Government Area of Kwara State. 2022; 6: 153–159.
18. Rabo M. Teacher –Students Relationship and Its Influence on Students’ Academic Performance in Senior Secondary Schools in Sokoto State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports. 2022; 16; 11: 68–76. DOI: 10.9734/ajarr/2022/v16i11439.
19. Gyeltshen Sh., Gyeltshen N. The Impact of Supportive Teacher-Student Relationships on Academic Performance. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports. 2022; 16; 12: 15–34. DOI: 10.9734/ajarr/2022/v16i12446.
20. Xu Zh., Qi Ch. The Relationship between Teacher-student Relationship and Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Selfefficacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2019; 15: 10. DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/105610.
21. Sinoy J. Enhancing Education: Examining the Relationship Between Teachers’ Job Satisfaction and Teaching Performance. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. 2024; 6; 2: 11-14.
22. Nahid Sh., Muzaffar N., Abbas M. Impact of Teachers’ Motivation on Students’ Performance. Global Educational Studies Review. 2023; 8; 2: 444–453. DOI: 10.31703/gesr.2023(VIII-II).40.
23. Lunkina M.V., Gordeyeva T.O., Diryugina Ye.G., Pshenichnyuk D.V. The quality of teaching as a predictor of educational engagement, well-being, and academic performance of schoolchildren. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika = Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Psychology and Pedagogy. 2023; 20; 3: 628–649. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-3-628-649. (In Russ.)
24. Gu H., Zhou S. The influence of teacher’s job satisfaction on students’ performance: An empirical analysis based on large-scale survey data of Jiangsu province. Sci Insigt Edu Front. 2020; 6; 1: 599–611.
25. Skripkina O.S., Karayev F. Comparative analysis of the results of assessing the influence of the level of qualification training of teachers and the academic performance of students in schools of the districts of St. Petersburg [Internet]. Mir pedagogiki i psikhologii: mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal = The world of pedagogy and psychology: international scientific and practical journal. 202: 06(107). Available from: https://scipress.ru/pedagogy/articles/sravnitelnyj-analiz-rezultatov-otsenki-vliyaniyaurovnya-kvalifikatsionnoj-podgotovki-pedagogovi-uspevaemosti-obuchayushhikhsya-shkolrajonov-g-sankt-peterburg.html. (In Russ.)
26. Mydin A., Xia Y., Long Y. Professional learning communities and their impact on teacher performance: Empirical evidence from public primary schools in Guiyang. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2024; 148: 104715.
27. Zakaria I., Nor M., Alias B. The Effect of Teachers’ Professionalism on Students’ Success. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2021; 11: 1. DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i1/8226.
28. Mak P. Impact of professional development programme on teachers’ competencies in assessment. Journal of Education for Teaching. 2019; 45: 1–5. DOI: 10.1080/02607476.2019.1639266.
29. Doornkamp L., Doornkamp F., Pol L., Groeneveld S., Mesman J., Groeneveld M. Student–teacher gender congruence and student performance: The role of context. Social Psychology of Education. 2024; 27; 6: 3299–3328. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09922-2.
30. Alnahdi G.H, Schwab S. The impact of gender differences in teachers’ teaching practices and attitudes on students’ math and science achievement in Saudi Arabia: Evidence from TIMSS 2019 data. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14: 1066843. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1066843.
31. Jones K. The impact of teacher diversity on student outcomes [Internet]. Theses and Dissertations. 2022:. 5429. Available from: https:// scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/5430.
32. Hasan A.M.M Mahmudul Teachers’ Feedback and Its Impact on Students’ Performance in Education. 2024; 8: 21–31.
33. Gore J., Rosser B., Jaremus F., Miller A., Harris J. Fresh evidence on the relationship between years of experience and teaching quality. The Australian Educational Researcher. 2023; 51(3): 547–570. DOI: 10.1007/s13384-023-00612-0.
34. Novopashina L. A., Grigor’yeva Ye. G., Kuzina D. V., Cherkasova YU. A. Factors linking teacher professional deficiencies with student learning outcomes. Vestnik NGPU = Science for Education Today. 2021: 6. (In Russ.)
35. Yontz B., Wilson R. Teacher Salary Differentials and Student Performance: Are They Connected? Journal of Educational Issues. 2021; 7; 1: 168–183. DOI: 10.5296/jei.v7i1.18400.
Review
For citations:
Petryaeva E.Yu., Sumenkova Yu.I., Fedorovskaya M.N. A Meta-Analysis of Relationship Between Teachers’ Personnel Characteristics and Academic Results of Students. Open Education. 2026;30(1):77-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2026-1-77-87
JATS XML
































