Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality in Teaching of Language Phraseology: Cognitive-Digital Model and Its Effectiveness

The purpose of the study is the development, theoretical substantiation, and empirical testing of a cognitive-digital model for teaching foreign language phraseology. This model is based on the integration of metaphorical modeling, generative artificial intelligence (AI), and virtual reality (VR). It aims to overcome the cognitive gap between the form and the culturally determined meaning of set expressions, which poses a significant challenge for learners. The research was carried out on the example of Spanish idioms in a university classroom. 

Materials and methods. The theoretical foundation is a synthesis of cognitive linguistics (conceptual metaphor theory), principles of embodied cognition, and social constructivism. A four-stage methodological model was developed, including: 1) semantic-cultural deconstruction using generative AI (ChatGPT-4, DeepSeek) and specialized prompt templates; 2) immersive visualization of the historical-cultural context in accessible VR environments (CoSpaces Edu, Google Cardboard); 3) contextualized practice of idiom usage with adaptive AI tools (Character.AI for dialogues, DeepL Write for text analysis, ELSA Speak for phonetic practice); 4) socioreflective transfer through a theatrical method with digital reflection tools (Padlet, Mentimeter). Empirical testing was conducted via a pedagogical experiment involving 60 A2-level linguistics students divided into control and experimental groups. Methods included preand post-testing, comparative and correlation analysis, qualitative analysis of the digital footprint (logs of interaction with AI and VR), expert assessment of video recordings of theatrical performances, and data triangulation.

Results. A statistically significant superiority of the experimental group over the control group was established across all measured parameters: recognition and understanding of idioms (p < 0.001, Cohen’s effect size d = 1.80), pragmatic choice of appropriate usage (p < 0.001, d = 1.45), and, especially, the task of explaining the conceptual foundations of idioms (p < 0.001, d = 2.30). Qualitative analysis revealed positive correlations between the structure of AI prompts (r = 0.65), active exploratory behavior in the VR environment (r = 0.71), and the depth of competence, facilitating a shift from rote memorization to meaningful mastery of phraseology. 

Conclusion. The proposed cognitive-digital model, which implements a sequential integration of metaphorical modeling, generative AI, and VR, is an effective tool for the deep acquisition of foreign language phraseology, as demonstrated by the example of Spanish. The scientific novelty lies in the theoretical and methodological synthesis of cognitive linguistics and digital pedagogy, as well as in the development of a comprehensive assessment model based on data triangulation. The practical significance consists in creating teaching modules, prompt templates, and VR scenarios adapted for A2–B1 levels, ready for the implementation in university practice. The identified limitations (digital fatigue, dependence on prompt quality) indicate the need for pedagogical support and preliminary development of AI interaction skills. Research prospects are associated with the development of an integrated software platform, adaptation of the model for other languages, and an in-depth study of digital load optimization.

1. Belova Ye.Ye., Taykova O.D. Working with phraseological units in foreign language lessons. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiy zhurnal «Gaudeamus» = Psychological and pedagogical journal «Gaudeamus». 2022; 21(1): 33–38. DOI: 10.20310/1810-231X-2022-21-1-33-38. (In Russ.)

2. Korobkova O.K., Galchenko N.A., Orekhovskaya N.A., Drozdova E.A., Zakharova O.V., Lobuteva A.V. A scoping review of contemporary frameworks, challenges, and future directions on educational technology for digital generations. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2025: 17(4). DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/17517.

3. Alimova R.R., Yakovleva V.V. Active metaphorical models in modern Spanish media discourse. Filologicheskiye nauki v MGIMO = Philological sciences at MGIMO. 2021; 7(5): 8–15. DOI: 10.24833/2410-2423-2021-5-29-8-15. (In Russ.)

4. Dubrovskaya V.V., Kabanova I.N., Romashkina T.S. Metaphorical models representing the concept of LOVE in English and Spanish song discourse. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Philological sciences. Theoretical and Practical Issues. 2023; 8(16): 2577–2582. DOI: 10.30853/phil20230404. (In Russ.)

5. Khoreva L.G Metaphor as a Basic Constant of Spanish Fiction. Aktual’nyye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoy lingvistiki = Actual Problems of Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2021; 2: 262–271. DOI: 10.29025/2079-6021-2021-2-262-271. (In Russ.)

6. Rodríguez P.R. La metáfora como recurso didáctico fraseológico en el aula de ELE: un enfoque cultural y lingüístico contrastive. Normas. 2024: 14(1). DOI: 10.7203/Normas.v14i1.27899.

7. Sulavko A.Yu. Phraseological units as an ethnospecific segment of the worldview (based on the Spanish language). Problemy istorii, filologii, kul’tury = Problems of History, Philology, and Culture. 2013; 3(41): 276–282. (In Russ.)

8. López Castillo L.A., Arreola R.S., Lázaro Hernández J.A., Alvarado E. La metaforización en el aprendizaje de lenguas. El papel de la cultura en la competencia metafórica. Revista Lengua y Cultura. 2021; 3(5): 88–99. DOI: 10.29057/lc.v3i5.7850.

9. Zhukova T.A., Dronova S.Y., Zvereva E.V., Chernyshkova N.V., Shaburova E.A. Grammatical precision in early and late Russian English bilinguals: Focusing on past simple and present perfect. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies. 2025; 14(3): 352–365. DOI: 10.55493/5019.v14i3.5629.

10. Pérez M.A., Civarolo M.M. La metáfora como estrategia de enseñanza en el aula del siglo XXI. Revista Chilena de Pedagogía. 2020; 2(1): 25. DOI: 10.5354/2452-5855.2020.60555.

11. Montoro D.F., Baz A.A. Expresiones idiomáticas para el aprendizaje de la cultura en la clase de ELELanguage Expressions for Learning Culture in the ELE Class. Revista sobre investigaciones léxicas. 2024: 7(3). DOI: 10.17561/rilex.7.3.9085.

12. Paivio A. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986. 322 p.

13. Ureña Tormo C. Aportaciones de la lingüística cognitiva al ámbito de ELE: la enseñanza-aprendizaje de las metáforas lingüísticas. Foro de profesores de E/LE. 2023; 19: 85–103. DOI: 10.7203/foroele.19.27539.

14. Hernando Álvarez M.S. Conceptual metaphors in the learning of lexical collocations. Lenguaje y textos. 2023; 57: 65–76. DOI: 10.4995/lyt.2023.19383.

15. León Palacios B.V., Malave Valdez R.J., Acosta Fuentes K.L., Cabezas Galarza F.A. Las nuevas herramientas digitales en el aprendizaje en línea. Una revisión sistemática. RECIMUNDO. 2025; 9(1): 809–823. DOI: 10.26820/recimundo/9.(1).enero.2025.809-823.

16. Azamatova A.Kh., Bekeeva N.Zh., Sadibekov A.K. Digitalization of Language Education in Higher Education Institutions. Iasaýı ýnıversıtetíníń habarshysy. 2024; 133(3): 206–220. DOI: 10.47526/2024-3/2664-0686.87.

17. Konkol’ M.M., Mar’ina Ye.D. Methodological Foundations of the Metadigital Competence System (Based on Language Education). Obrazovaniye i nauka = Education and Science. 2025; 27(9): 9–29. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2025-9-9-29. (In Russ.)

18. Kapranova L.D. Digital Transformation of Society and the Standard of Living of the Population. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economy. Taxes. Law. 2025; 18(3): 81–91. DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-3-81-91. (In Russ.)

19. Al-Kaisi A.N., Arkhangelskaya A., Rudenko-Morgun O. The didactic potential of the voice assistant “Alice” for students of a foreign language at a university. Education and Information Technologies. 2021; 26(6): 715–732. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10277-2.

20. Kozlovtseva N.A. The potential of using VR technologies in teaching Russian as a foreign language. MNKO = MNKO. 2024; 1(104): 65–67. (In Russ.)

21. Rzanova S., Yushchik E., Markova S., Sergeeva A. Impact of virtual reality technologies in the context of the case method on engineering students’ competencies. Education and Information Technologies. 2024; 29(6): 7341–7359. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-023-12123-7.

22. Khoudri I. Revolutionizing English Language Learning with AI: Boosting Student Receptive and Productive Skills. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 2024; 22(2): 1660–1670. DOI: 10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00115.

23. Al-Smadi O., Ab Rashid R., Saed H., Zrekat Y., Abdullah Kamal S.S.L., Gaforov I.U. Artificial Intelligence for English Language Learning and Teaching: Advancing Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2024; 15(6): 1835–1844. DOI: 10.17507/jltr.1506.09.

24. Vasbieva D.G. On the use of modern digital technologies in teaching a foreign language at a university. Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023; 13(2): 24–31. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-c-24-31.

25. Baguzina E. Teaching Foreign Languages at University: New Online Formats for Digital Generation Students. The Proceedings of the Conference The Magic of Innovation. 2024: 6(2). DOI: 10.24833/2949-6357.2024.BEI.2

26. Murrugarra-Retamozo B.I. Aprendizaje de idiomas extranjeros con apps basadas en inteligencia artificial: perspectivas de jóvenes universitarios. Revista de Ciencias Sociales Aplicadas. 2024; 4(2): 11–33. DOI: 10.47190/rcsaw.v4i2.113.

27. García Fernández M. Inteligencia artificial y léxico: Una propuesta con ChatGPT para niveles B1 y B2 en la enseñanza del español como lengua extranjera. RILEX Revista sobre investigaciones léxicas. 2024; 7(3): 27–45. DOI: 10.17561/rilex.7.3.9111.

28. Ishmuratova I.I., Chistyakov A.A., Brodskaya T.A., Kosarenko N.N., Savchenko N.V., Shindryaeva N.N. Latent profiles of AI learning conditions among university students: Implications for educational intentions. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2025: 17(2). DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/15907.

29. Vorobyeva K.I., Belous S., Savchenko N.V., Smirnova L.M., Nikitina S.A., Zhdanov S.P. Personalized learning through AI: Pedagogical approaches and critical insights. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2025: 17(2). DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/16108.

30. Gnedykh D.S., Bordovskaya N.V., Koshkina Ye.A., Posokhova S.T., Khromova M.A., Iskhakova M.P. Developing Students’ Subjectivity in Interaction with Generative Artificial Intelligence: Systematization of Scientific Concepts. Obrazovaniye i nauka = Education and Science. 2025; 27(8): 9–34. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2025-8-9-34. (In Russ.)

31. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2003. 193 p. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001.

32. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511811678.

33. Rogach O.V., Frolova E.V., Kuznetsov Y.V. Control Student Knowledge in the Context of Digitalization of Education: New Problems and Risks. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2024; 13(1): 222–233. DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2024.1.222.

34. Tikhonova N.V., Sabirova D.R. Teacher Literacy in the Field of Artificial Intelligence: Theoretical Analysis of the Concept. Obrazovaniye i nauka = Education and Science. 2025; 27(6): 180–206. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2025-6-180-206. (In Russ.)

35. Revenko L.S., Revenko N.S. Artificial Intelligence: Modern Approaches to Multilateral Regulation. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economy. Taxes. Law. 2025; 18(5): 165–177. DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-5-165-177. (In Russ.)