Prompt Engineering as a Tool for Developing Scientific Text Understanding at Higher Education Institutions

Purpose of the research. This article aims to identify the potential of PROMPT engineering as one of the ways to help students comprehend what they read, including scientific texts, in the context of digitalization of higher education. The purpose of this study is to explore the potential of PROMPT engineering when working with large-scale artificial intelligence language models to improve students’ comprehension of scientific texts.
Research materials and methods: the study design involved obtaining indexes of scientific text comprehension before and after the implementation of PROMPT engineering. The study utilized testing based on T. Borzov’s “Understanding scientific text” methodology, which relies on student self-reflection, and a questionnaire, which allows for a further analysis of scientific text comprehension at a deeper, qualitative level, as opposed to self-reflection. To create a prompt, students were given a brief outline, emphasizing that prompt writing was a creative activity. Mathematical statistics were used to analyze the data. A total of 57 students were surveyed, including 25 first-year students and 32 second-year students. The distribution of each group corresponded to a normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk, p = 0.548).
Results. To evaluate the results before and after the application of prompt engineering based on T. Borzov’s “Understanding scientific text” method; we used a paired samples t-test to compare two measurements of the same group: Measure 1 (before) and Measure 2 (after). The purpose of the test is to determine whether there is a significant mean difference between the two related data sets. 25 participants completed the study (p = 0.373): a two-tailed p-value indicating no statistically significant difference between the mean values before and after the study at the α = 0.05 level. Furthermore, a qualitative analysis of the questionnaires indicates that students’ responses after the prompt were characterized by greater accuracy and clarity of presentation, relevance, conciseness, and depth.
Conclusion. The authors concluded that students experience difficulty understanding scientific texts, particularly in identifying key points and conclusions. These results of the pilot study generally suggest positive predictions regarding the use of prompt engineering to develop students’ deeper understanding of scientific texts.

1. Walter Y. Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International journal of educational technology in higher education. 2024; 21; 1: 15. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3.

2. Kameneva-Lyubavskaya Ye.N., Borzova T.V. Developing the skills of understanding scientific text as a way of successful andragogical learning. Psikhologiya. Istoriko-kriticheskiye obzory i sovremennyye issledovaniya = Psychology. Historical and critical reviews and modern research. 2023; 12; 10A: 233- 244. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2023.38.63.024. (In Russ.)

3. Borzova T. V. Questionnaire «Understanding of a scientific text»: the search for ways to diagnose understanding in learning. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Sotsial’nyye, gumanitarnyye, mediko-biologicheskiye nauki = Bulletin of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, Humanitarian, Medical and Biological Sciences. 2020; 22; 72: 15-26. DOI: 10.37313/2413-9645-2020-22-72-15-26. (In Russ.)

4. Tsvetkova L.A., Nikitina Ye.A., SutorminaN.V., Sbitneva A.A. Miklyayeva A.V. The Relationships between Students’ Self-Assessment of Difficulties in Understanding Scientific Texts Presented on Paper and Digital Media and Oculographic Indicators. Science for Education Today = Science for Education Today. 2025; 15; 1: 24-46. DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2501.02. (In Russ.)

5. Steele J. L. To GPT or not GPT? Empowering our students to learn with AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2023; 5: 100160. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100160.

6. Chan C. A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2023: 20(1). DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3.

7. Warschauer M., Tseng W., Yim S., Webster T., Jacob S., Du Q., & Tate T. The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2023: 62.

8. Sujaini H., Safriadi N., Khairiyah D. System interactive reader using eye-tracker technology in ebook reader. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics. 2024; 13(3): 1676–1684. DOI: 10.11591/eei.v13i3.5877.

9. Zil’berman N.N. Generative AI in Higher Education: Conditions for Supporting Students’ Metacognitive Regulation. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2026; 30(1): 15- 22. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2026-1-15-22. (In Russ.)

10. Shamsutdinova T.M. Application of Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education: Technological Trends and Ethical Aspects. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2025; 29(6): 49-57. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2025-6-49-57. (In Russ.)

11. Gladkova L.N., Krezhevskikh O.V., Skorobogatov D.V., Savel’yeva A.A. Bulatova O.V., Gafner A. I. Specifics of the effectiveness of reading complex professional texts when working with an AI agent: assessment of the level of assimilation taking into account the establishment of the duration and number of fixations of the gaze. Science for Education Today = Science for Education Today. 2026; 16; 1: 246–270. DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2601.11. (In Russ.)

12. Pletnev Ye.A. Working with texts as a basic component of modern education in the context of the development of neural networks. Uchenyye zapiski Zabaykal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Scientific notes of the Zabaikalsky State University. 2025; 20; 1: 34-42. DOI: 10.21209/2658-7114-2025-20-1-34-42. (In Russ.)

13. Lukinskiy I.S., Gorsheneva I.A. Industrial engineering in the educational process and scientific activity, or on the need for training in working with artificial intelligence. Psikhologiya i pedagogika sluzhebnoy deyatel’nosti = Psychology and pedagogy of service activity. 2024; 4: 148-154. DOI: 10.24412/2658-638X-2024-4-148-154. (In Russ.)

14. Minakov A.I., Surkhayev M.A. Prompt engineering in solving educational problems (application when working with text queries to neural networks). Sovremennyy uchenyy = Modern Scientist. 2026; 1: 324-330. (In Russ.)

15. Shamsutdinov R.S., Isavnin A.G., Pleshchov I.e., Khasanova A.R., Sergeyeva D.V. Prompt engineering as a key factor in creating pedagogically relevant tasks using artificial intelligence. Vestnik pedagogicheskikh nauk = Bulletin of pedagogical sciences. 2025; 11: 327-334. (In Russ.)

16. Glukhikh I.N., Glukhikh K.I. Development of expert systems based on a large language model and generation with augmented sampling. Inzhenernyy vestnik Dona = Engineering Bulletin of the Don. 2025; 11(131): 287-313. (In Russ.)

17. Lee U., Jung H., Jeon Y., Sohn Y., Hwang W., Moon J., & Kim H. Few-shot is enough: exploring ChatGPT prompt engineering method for automatic question generation in english education. Education and Information Technologies. 2024; 29; 9: 11483- 11515. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-023-12249-8.