Preview

Open Education

Advanced search

Some effects of a modern university educational environment informatization

https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2016-3-24-30

Abstract

The paper analyzes the effects that occur in the process of the educational environment informatization. The following effects were analyzed: information richness, openness, individualization of learning and collaboration. Examples of educational practice, illustrating the significant changes of the university educational environment associated with the manifestation of these effects, are presented. The aim of the pilot study carried out in Herzen University was to identify the attitude to the listed effects of teachers and students who are using information and communication technology in the educational interactions. The leading method of study were a series of surveys addressed to teachers and students. Groups of questions were related to basic information effects, manifested in the educational environment of the university. The total number of the survey participants is 200 students (bachelors and masters) and 100 teachers, most actively using electronic environment for research, education and professional activities. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the results showed that information richness, spatial and temporal freedom of educational interactions are demanded by students, but at the same time, the data indicated a lack of systematic pedagogical support for the information and educational activities of students. A large part of students show a high autonomy in the information educational environment, but also demands implementing individualized information and communication educational request. Students and teachers are actively using a variety of information and communication opportunities of the electronic environment, but students’ activeness in the electronic environment is largely determined by the recommendations of teachers, rather than by a free choice of educational opportunities. The participants of the educational environment acquire a significant degree of freedom in relation to the time and place of interaction with educational resources, but evidence suggests that educational activities in the electronic environment is not sufficiently focused on expanding the range of educational opportunities and preparing students for continual self-improvement of knowledge and skills. As the conclusions, we note the need to improve both the corporate strategy of the university electronic environment development and the competences of educational interactions in the extended information and communication space. This will reveal the full potential of e-learning environment and provide greater guarantees for obtaining high-quality educational outcomes. For teachers are in demand special competences, providing the possibility of forming a diverse and adaptive media environment for saturated solution of educational problems in accordance with university policies, introduction of e-learning and global education trends. For students, come to the fore the competences which help to improve their information culture and individual requests for the use of a variety of educational opportunities available in the electronic space. These ideas are fully consistent with the demanded by modern society the lifelong learning strategy.

About the Authors

T. N. Noskova
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation

Doctor of Pedagogical Science, professor, Director of Institute of Computer Science and Technology Education,

Moscow



T. B. Pavlova
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Science, associate professor of the Chair of Methods of Information and Technology Education,

Moscow



O. V. Yakovleva
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation

Candidate of Pedagogical Science, associate professor of the Chair of Methods of Information and Technology Education,

Moscow



References

1. Monahov D.N. Blended learning in a networked educational paradigm // Innovation in education. – 2015. – №2. – P. 85–92

2. Krechetnikov K.G. Proektirovanie sredstv informacionnyh tehnologij obuchenija // Obrazovatel’nye tehnologii i obshhestvo. – 2002. – №1. – P. 222–243.

3. Robert I.V. Informatizacija obrazovanija kak novaja oblast’ pedagogicheskogo znanija // Chelovek i obrazovanie. – 2012. – №1 (30). – P. 14 – 18.

4. Laal M., Salamati P. Lifelong learning and art. // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. – 2014. – 116, c. 4047–4051.

5. Labunskaja N.A. Individual’nyj obrazovatel’nyj marshrut studenta: podhody k raskrytiju ponjatija // Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena. – 2002. – №3. – P. 79–90.

6. Sergeev A.N. Obuchenie v setevyh soobshhestvah interneta kak napravlenie informatizacii obrazovanija // Izvestija VGPU. – 2011. – №8. – S.73–77.

7. Trjapicyna A.P. Metodologicheskie predposylki postroenija pedagogicheskoj teorii obrazovanija // Aktual’nye problemy pedagogicheskoj nauki. Naukovedcheskij aspekt, SPb, 2001. – S. 67–76.

8. Rahimi E., Berg J., Veen W. Facilitating studentdriven constructing of learning environments using Web 2.0 personal learning environments // Computers & Education. – 2015. – 81, c. 235–246.

9. Van Harmelen H. Design trajectories: four experiments in PLE implementation // Interactive Learning Environments. – 2008. – 16 (1), – c. 35–46.

10. Patarakin E.D. Vklad setevyh soobshhestv v obrazovanie // Jelektronnye biblioteki. – 2002. – T. 5. – № 3. – P. 5.

11. Andreev A.A. The role and problems of the teacher in e-learning environment // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. – 2010. – № 8/9. – p. 41 – 45.

12. Kuz’minskaja E.G. Informacionnye tehnologii i nauchnaja kommunikacija: instrumenty i modeli vnedrenija v uslovijah universiteta // Obrazovatel’nye tehnologii i obshhestvo. – 2014. – T. 17, № 1. – P. 447 – 456.

13. Osnovy otkrytogo obrazovanija / A.A. Andreev i dr. – M.: NIIC RAO. – T. 1. – 2002.

14. Zaharov A.A., Zaharova I.G. Jelektronnaja biblioteka vuza s razvitoj set’ju filialov kak osnova dlja stanovlenija korporativnoj informacionnoj obrazovatel’noj sredy // Otkrytoe obrazovanie. – 2003. – №1. – P.18 – 23.

15. Matjukin S.V., Krevskij I.G. Formy i mehanizmy setevogo vzaimodejstvija vuzov i real’nogo sektora jekonomiki v oblasti obrazovatel’noj i innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija. – 2013. – № 6. – P. 439.

16. Scientifi c Output and Collaboration of European Universities / Labrosse I. и др. – 2013. [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/scientific_output_collaboration_european_univ.pdf (дата обращения 15.10.2015).


Review

For citations:


Noskova T.N., Pavlova T.B., Yakovleva O.V. Some effects of a modern university educational environment informatization. Open Education. 2016;(3):24-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2016-3-24-30

Views: 1287


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-4243 (Print)
ISSN 2079-5939 (Online)