Ontological approach in the practice of the educational activity: paths’ formation of individual professional development of students

Goal. The goal of the work is to develop the improved ontological model of the competency-oriented curricula, allowing constructing individual professional development paths of the students of particular educational profiles. Actuality of the developed model lies in the fact that the competence structure, existing in the framework of competency-oriented curricula, provided by the current Federal state educational standards does not allow differentiating within the same profile of learning the paths of individual professional development of the student, oriented to various career development directions within the general vocational orientation profile.

Materials and methods. Individual educational paths can be differentiated according to the choice of the elective disciplines (as common to all profiles within the educational program, and profile). According to the educational standards, the student during the period of study on the educational program must acquire the entire cultural, professional and profile competences (in case of several profiles, existing in the structure of the educational program), provided in the educational plan. Respectively, the elective disciplines between which the students are allowed to choose can be characterized in the plan by one set of competences. Thus, for the construction of the students’ individual professional paths there is the need to differentiate these disciplines.

To develop the tools for reaching this goal, the ontological model of the competence-oriented curriculum is constructed, and the algorithm of forming the competences, “complementary” to the competences of the curriculum is suggested. Practical application of the tools is illustrated by developing the “complementary” competences of a specific profile of education (“information management”) of the basic educational program (Bachelor in Management) of 2017 admission year in one of the leading Russian universities.

Results. The main methodological result of the work is the suggested algorithm of “complementary” competences formation. The algorithm includes the following steps:

1. Analysis of the existing competences of the curriculum;

2. Figuring out the criteria of decomposition of the existing competences of the plan and sources of formation of the “complementary” competences;

3. Formation of the “complementary” competences, allowing differentiation between the professional and profile elective disciplines;

4. Mapping the formed “complementary” competences with the elective disciplines, allowing constructing the individual professional development paths.

Practical approbation of the developed algorithm shows its applicability for reaching the designated objectives. Based on the formed algorithm the improved ontological model of the competence-oriented curriculum has been developed, including external sources of the “complementary” competences.

Conclusion. The developed tools of differentiating between the elective disciplines of the competence-oriented curriculum have several directions of potential practical applicability. Firstly, students can use these tools for the individual professional development paths’ formation. Secondly, management of the educational programs could use these tools for upgrading the competence-based curricula. Namely, the suggested tools allow increasing logical and systemic self-consistency of the curricula without fundamentally altering their structure; in addition, the tools enable timely correction of curriculum content in accordance with changes in the needs of current and potential employers of the relevant sectors of the economy.

1. Order No. 1367 of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 19, 2013 “On approving the procedure for organizing and conducting educational activities in higher education educational programs - undergraduate programs, specialty programs, graduate programs” [Internet]. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. Available from: https://minobrnauki.rf/documents/5242. (In Russ.)

2. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated January 12, 2016 No. 7 “On approval of the federal state educational standard of higher education in the direction of training 38.03.02 Management (undergraduate level)” [Internet]. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. Available from: https: //minobrnauki.rf/documents/7982. (In Russ.)

3. Polyansky A.M., Smirnova E.A. Designing the work program of the discipline on the basis of the elements of competence. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2018; 22-3: 35–51.

4. Orlova E.V., Martynova T.A., Zhukova K.V., Pleshkova A.Yu. Language and communication teaching at business school: new perspectives. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management. 2018; 16-2: 322–339.

5. Zhukova K.V., Pleshkova A.Yu., Mihnevich A.V., Pehtin, I.E. One Approach to Administrative and Educational Processes Modeling: Case of Bachelor Program. International Journal of Education and Social Science. 2016; 3-3: 58–66.

6. Prilepina A.V., Morkovina E.F., SHukhman A.E. Methods of developing educational programs for training specialists for the information technology industry. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Orenburg State University. 2016; 1: 41–46. (In Russ.)

7. Aray Y.N., Verkhovskaya O.R., Klёmina T.N. Learning strategies in business schools: modern challenges. Vestnik SPbGU. Menedzhment = SPbSU Bulletin. Management. 2017; 16-2: 299– 321. (In Russ.)

8. Boychenko G.N., Kundozerova L.I. Distributed educational process: the basics of design and implementation. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2016; 20-3: 16–23. (In Russ.)

9. Gasparian M.S., Lebedev S.A., Tel’nov YU.F. Engineering educational programs based on the use of intelligent technologies. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2017; 21-1: 14–19. (In Russ.)

10. Dobrokhotov A. L. Ontologiya. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya New Philosophical Encyclopedia / Institute of Philosophy, RAS; Nat Society-nauch. fund; 2nd ed. Moscow: Mysl’, 2010. (In Russ.)

11. Studer R., Benjamins R., Fensel D. Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods. Data and Knowledge Engineering. 1998; 25(1-2): 161– 197. Doi: 10.1016/S0169-023X(97)00056-6.

12. Gruber T. A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition. 1993; 5(2): 199–220. Doi: 10.1006/knac.1993.1008.

13. Guarino N. Concepts, attributes and arbitrary relations. Data Knowledge Engineering. 1992; 8: 249–261. Doi: 10.1016/0169-023X(92)90025-7.

14. Gavrilova T. A., Muromtsev, D. I. Intellektual’nyye tekhnologii v menedzhmente: instrumenty i sistemy: Uchebnoye posobiye = Intellectual technologies in management: tools and systems: Tutorial. Saint Petersburg: Graduate School of Management, Ed. House of St. Petersburg State University; 2007. 488 p. (In Russ.)

15. Gavrilova T.A., Khoroshevskiy V.F. Bazy znaniy intellektual’nykh system = Knowledge bases of intellectual systems. Moscow: Piter; 2000. 382 p. (In Russ.)

16. Aleshchenko A.S., Trembach V.M. Intellectual teaching system of the university department. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2016; 5: 47–52. (In Russ.)

17. Vigers K.I, Bitti Dzh. Razrabotka trebovaniy k programmnomu obespecheniyu = Developing Software Requirements. Moscow: Russian Edition; 2016. P. 1–575. (In Russ.)

18. Chezboro G. U. The Logic of “Open” Innovations: A New Approach to Intellectual Property Management. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal. 2004; 2-4: 67–96. (In Russ.)

19. Mishina Y.A., Veriga A.V. Noosphere vector of management of the system of higher professional education. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2017; 21-5: 72-81. (In Russ.)

20. 20) Federal law of 10.11.2009 No. 259-ФЗ “About Moscow State University named after MV Lomonosov and St. Petersburg State University”. Russian newspaper. 2009. Federal issue No.5038 (214). (In Russ.)

21. Professional standards in the field of IT [Internet]. Official site of the association of enterprises of computer and information technology. Available from: http://www.apkit.ru/committees/education/meetings/standarts.php. (In Russ.)

22. Kudryavtsev D.V., Zaramenskikh E.P., Arzumanyan M.Y. Development of educational methodology for managing enterprise architecture. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2017; 21-4: 84–92. (In Russ.)