Preview

Open Education

Advanced search

A model of readiness for research activity of students of pedagogical high school and teachers of educational institutions

https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2019-3-4-13

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the consideration of the problem of finding approaches to assessing the level of formation of teachers’ readiness for research activities, as one of the important components of their professional practice. Recognition of the significance of the phenomenon under consideration in the educational sphere and the realization that the system of pedagogical support for research activities of future teachers in pedagogical higher educational institutions, and teachers in the system of raising their qualifications to some extent outdated, require their substantial renewal. In this connection, the problems of searching for approaches to the study of ways of forming teachers’ readiness for research activities become relevant, which makes it necessary to build a model of such readiness itself.

The aim of the paper is to analyze the state and develop a model of readiness for research activities of students of a pedagogical higher educational institution and teachers of educational institutions.

The main research methods are theoretical analysis of scientific and psychological-pedagogical literature devoted to the problem of research, testing of teachers of general educational institutions, bachelors and masters studying at a pedagogical university, methods of mathematical processing of statistical data.

Means of researching the problem posed is criterion-based questionnaire-test tools, which allow to identify correlation dependencies between the indicators of the components of readiness for research activities and the levels of its formation.

The study was conducted on the basis of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after VP. Astafyev with the participation of bachelors, master and teachers of educational institutions.

The analysis of the state of the problem of research activities in the training of future teachers in a pedagogical university and teachers of educational institutions based on questionnaire and test diagnosed tools revealed correlations between the indicators of the four components in the structure of students’ readiness for research (motivational, cognitive, activity, reflexive) and levels this readiness (student, practitioner, theorist, research leader).

The obtained dependencies and research data allowed to form a model of readiness for research activities of students of a pedagogical university and teachers of educational institutions, describing the degree of formation of each component at each level.

The article materials may be useful for the organization of computer diagnostics of the readiness in question. Such diagnostics will not only allow automated identification of the level of readiness for research activities, but also give recommendations on the development of a particular characteristic, show how close the respondent is to the next level and what he needs to do to do this. 

About the Authors

D. A. Barkhatova
Astafyev Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Darya A. BarkhatovaCand. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor of Department of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education 

Krasnoyarsk



P. S. Lomasko
Astafyev Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Pavel S. LomaskoCand. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Department of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education 

Krasnoyarsk



N. I. Pak
Astafyev Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Nikolay I. PakDr. Sci. (Pedagogy), Professor of Department of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education 

Krasnoyarsk

 



References

1. The program of popularization of scientific, scientific and technical and innovation activities, approved. Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, 06.24.2017. [Internet] URL: https://legalacts.ru/doc/programma-populjarizatsii-nauchnoi-nauchno-tekhnicheskoi-i-innovatsionnoi-dejatelnosti-utv-minekonomrazvitija/ (Cited: 29.04.2019). (In Russ.)

2. Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education in the Direction of Training 44.03.01 Pedagogical education. [Internet]. Portal of the Federal State Educational Standards for Higher Education. URL: http://fgosvo.ru/news/8/1583 (Cited: 31.04.2019). (In Russ.)

3. Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education in the direction of training 44.03.05 Pedagogical education (with two training profiles). [Internet]. Portal of the Federal State Educational Standards for Higher Education. URL: http://fgosvo.ru/news/7/1805 (Cited: 31.04.2019). (In Russ.)

4. SHadchin I.V. Methods for assessing the level of readiness of students of the university for research activities [Internet]. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya obrazovaniya: materialy II Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. = (g. Perm’, may 2012 g.). = Problems and Prospects for the Development of Education: Proceedings of the II International. scientific conf. (Perm, May 2012). Perm: Mercury; 2012: 170-173. URL: https://moluch.ru/conf/ped/archive/58/2276/ (Cited: 28.04.2019). (In Russ.)

5. Zeyer E. F. Modernization of vocational education: a competence-based approach. Nauka i obrazovaniye = Science and Education. 2004; (3): 35–43. (In Russ.)

6. Popov L.M. Psikhologiya samodeyatel’nogo tvorchestva studentov = Psychology of amateur creativity of students. Kazan: Kazan University Publishing House; 1990. 240 p. (In Russ.)

7. Fedorova G.A. Preparation of future teachers for the organization of research activities of students in the conditions of informatization of education. Vestnik CHGPU = Bulletin of CHGPU. 2014; 7: 212-219. (In Russ.)

8. Adey P. A model for the professional development of teachers of thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2006; 1 (1): 49-56. DOI: 10.1002/jocb.20

9. Baltusite R., Katane I. The structure model of the pedagogy students’ readiness for profetional activities in the educational environments. Rural Environ. Educ. Personal. 2014: 29-41.

10. Kocor M. Teachers’ professional competences in theory and practice. Practice and Theory in Systems of Education. 2012; 7(2); 175-187.

11. Baimukhambetova B.S., Nauryzbaevna E.K., Li E.D. et al. Preparation of Students of Pedagogical Universities to Guide the Project-Research Activity of Pupils. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 2016; 11(7); 2177-2185.

12. CHurayeva E.P. Scientific-research competence of a philologist in pedagogical activity. Vektor nauki TGU = Vector of science at TSU. 2013; 4 (26): 300-303. (In Russ.)

13. Fedorova M.A., Zav’yalov A.M. Diagnostics of the readiness of technical university students for research activities [Internet]. Obrazovaniye i nauka = Education and science. 2014; 1 (110). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/diagnostika-gotovnosti-studentov-tehnicheskogo-vuza-k-nauchno-issledovatelskoy-deyatelnosti (Cited: 28.05.2019). (In Russ.)

14. Dubovitskaya T.D. To the problems of diagnosing educational motivation. Voprosy psikhologii = Questions of psychology. 2005 (1): 73. (In Russ.)

15. Badmayeva N.TS. Vliyaniye motivatsionnogo faktora na razvitiye umstvennykh sposobnostey: Monografiya. = Influence of the motivational factor on the development of mental abilities: Monograph. Ulan- Ude: VSSTU Publishing House; 2004. 280 p. (In Russ.)

16. SHelkovnikova N.V. Research work of students at junior courses of agricultural universities as a factor in the development of internal learning motivation [Internet]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovaniy = International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2009 (4): 52-60. URL: https://applied-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=82 (Cited: 09.06.2019). (In Russ.)

17. Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manuylov G.M. Express diagnostics of organizational skills. In the book: Socio-psychological diagnosis of personality development and small groups. Moscow; 2002: 272- 273. (In Russ.)

18. Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V. V., Manuylov G. M. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp = Socio-psychological diagnosis of personality development and small groups. Moscow: Publishing House of the Institute of Psychotherapy; 2002: 48. (In Russ.)

19. Karpov A.V. Reflexivity as a mental property and a method for its diagnosis. Psikhologicheskiy ZHurnal = Psychological Journal. 2003; 5: 45-57. (In Russ.)

20. Slastenin V.A., Isayev I.F., Mishchenko A.I., SHiyanov E.N. Pedagogika: Uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov pedagogicheskikh uchebnykh zavedeniy = Pedagogy: A manual for students of pedagogical educational institutions. Moscow: School-Press; 1997. 512 p. (In Russ.)

21. Zykova N.YU., Lapkova O.S., KHlopovskikh YU.G. Metody matematicheskoy obrabotki dannykh psikhologo-pedagogicheskogo issledovaniya: uch. posobiye dlya vuzov = Methods of mathematical data processing, psychological and pedagogical research: manual for universities. Voronezh: Publishing and Printing Center of the Voronezh State University; 2008. 84 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Barkhatova D.A., Lomasko P.S., Pak N.I. A model of readiness for research activity of students of pedagogical high school and teachers of educational institutions. Open Education. 2019;23(3):4-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2019-3-4-13

Views: 895


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-4243 (Print)
ISSN 2079-5939 (Online)