The Blended Learning Science Training
https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2020-2-39-46
Abstract
Purpose of research. In conditions of digitalization of society and economy, information is considered to be the main value, not the material wealth. That is, information and information technologies are of particular importance today. Since the term “informatics" means both information science and the whole field related to the use of information and communication technologies, it can be concluded that the importance of students’ training in informatics, regardless of the specialty chosen, is increased. The main aim of the work is to identify the most effective technology of students’ training in informatics at the technical university, as representatives of the digital generation and to organize from these positions the methodology of training in informatics in the digital educational environment.
Materials and methods. This article analyzed two models of training: face-to-face and electronic training revealed their positive and negative aspects. It has been established that in modern conditions of digitalization of society and education it is possible to optimally combine strengths of traditional education with advantages of electronic training technologies. The blended technology of the informatics training of the technical university students is offered as a harmonious combination of face-to-face and electronic training technologies. The use of blended learning technology in the informatics training leads to a change of the lecturer role and a reorganization of both the content of the discipline and the methods and means of learning. The reference points are the requirements for the specialists of digital society, the peculiarities of the digital generation of students and the principles of digital didactics, which ensure the formation and development of the competences required today.
Results. The stages of design of the course “Informatics" on the blended training technology are described: design of the results of training on discipline; development of evaluation activities; development of a system of interaction between participants. According to the principles of the personal-centered approach to training, the content of the discipline has a modular structure. This allows the student to create their individual trajectory of informatics learning. In order to take into account the peculiarities of perception of information by representatives of the digital generation, the content of the course is presented using traditional methodology and nonlinear technologies of informatics training: concentric, parallel and cognitive; lectures are given as text, presentations and infographics; for each module a mental map is created, allowing to cover the content of the module in its entirety and study it not sequentially, but at its own discretion. Each module specifies the respective objectives and expected results of the training with an indication of the level on Bloom taxonomy. Control questions for theoretical material, execution of practical tasks, intermediate and final testing by module are identified as evaluation measures.
Conclusion. It is shown that training in informatics according to a blended model provides an increase in the level of students ’ motivation to learn and the level of theoretical material understanding; increasing their level of activity in the informatics learning in the information and educational environment and forming communication competences; students mastering new activities; flexibility, mobility, and learning availability. All this in the end contributes to the formation of competences required for successful professional activity in modern conditions.
About the Authors
T P. PushkaryevaRussian Federation
Tatyana P. Pushkareva
Dr. Sci. (Pedagogical) Sciences, Associate Professor
Krasnoyarsk
V. V. Kalitina
Russian Federation
Vera V. Kalitina
Cand. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor
Krasnoyarsk
References
1. Rasporyazheniye Pravitel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.07.2017 № 1632-r «Ob utverzhdenii programmy «Tsifrovaya ekonomika Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (razdel 2 — «Kadry i obrazovaniye») = The order of the Government of the Russian Federation dated July 28, 2017 No. 1632-r “On approval of the program“ Digital Economy of the Russian Federation”(section 2 - “Personnel and Education ”) [Internet]. Available from http://static.government.ru/media/f!les/9gFM4FHj4PsB79I5v7yLVuPgu4bvR7M0.pdf. (In Russ.)
2. Abdrakhmanova G.I., Vishnevskiy K.O., Gokhberg L.M. . What is a digital economy? Trends, competencies, measurement. XX Aprel’skaya mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva = XX April International Scientific Conference on the Problems of Economic and Social Development (April 9—12. 2019. Moscow). Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics; 2019. 82 p. (In Russ.)
3. Kolin K.K. Informatics as a fundamental science. Informatika i obrazovaniye = Informatics and education. 2007; 6: 46-55. (In Russ.)
4. Federal’nyy zakon ot 29.12.2012 No. 273-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016) «Ob obrazovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami, vstupayet v silu s 01.09.2016) = Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-ФЗ (as amended on July 3, 2016) “On Education in the Russian Federation” (with amendments and additions, comes into force on September 1, 2016). (In Russ.)
5. Satunina A.Ye. E-learning: pros and cons. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern problems of science and education. 2006; 1: 89-90. (In Russ.)
6. Arkhangel’skaya A.L., Zhigunova O.M. E-learning in the system of modern higher education. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice. 2014; 3 (33): 19-22. (In Russ.)
7. Mamedova G. A., Agayev F. T. Modern technologies of electronic education. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2017; 3: 73-79. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2017-3-73-79. (In Russ.)
8. Polat Ye.S., Bukharkina M.YU. , Moiseyeva M.V. Teoriya i praktika distantsionnogo obucheniya= Theory and practice of distance learning. Moscow: Publishing Center «Academy»; 2004. 416 p. (In Russ.)
9. Lednev V.A. “MOSCOW Education Online” - a discussion platform for e-learning. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2009; 7: 5—8. (In Russ.)
10. Patarakin, Ye.D. Sotsial’noye vzaimodeystviye i setevoye obucheniye 2.0. = Social interaction and network education 2.0. Moscow: NP «Modern technologies in education and culture»; 2009. 176 p. (In Russ.)
11. Stupin A.A., Stupin Ye.Ye. E-learning (E-Learning) - problems and prospects of research. Distantsionnoye i virtual’noye obucheniye = Remote and virtual learning. 2012; 1: 38—49. (In Russ.)
12. Shkapenko T.M. E-learning: the current state of the problem in the university system of education in Russia and foreign countries. Vestnik MGIMO- Universiteta = Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. 2013; 6 (33): 72-75. (In Russ.)
13. Mozhayeva G.V. Luchshiye praktiki elektronnogo obucheniya = Best e-learning practices. Tomsk: Tomsk University Press; 2015. (In Russ.)
14. Sklyarenko T. M. Distance education: foreign concepts. Innovatsionnyye proyekty i programmy v obrazovanii = Innovative projects and programs in education. 2013; 5: 65-69. (In Russ.)
15. Ferguson R. Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning. 2012; 4(5-6): 304-317.
16. Alvarez C., Salavati S., Nussbaum M., & Milrad M. Collboard Fostering new media literacies in the classroom through collaborative problem solving supported by digital pens and interactive whiteboards. Computers and Education. 2013; 63: 368-379.
17. Illiana Mijares I Blended learning: Are we getting the best from both worlds? Literature Review for EDST 561 [Internet]. Available from: http:// dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0075749
18. Richards Griff. Athabasca University. Learning Analitics: On the Way to Smart Education [Internet]. Available from: https://slideplayer.com/slide/3740970/.
19. Fomina A.S. Blended learning at the university: institutional, organizational, technological and pedagogical aspects. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya = Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2014; 21: 272-279. (In Russ.)
20. Kapustin YU.I. Stanovleniye i razvitiye sistemy distantsionnogo obrazovaniya v vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniyakh = Formation and development of the distance education system in higher educational institutions. Moscow: MGOPU = MGPOU; 2006. 82 p. (In Russ.)
21. Dolgova T.V. Blended Learning - An Innovation of the 21st Century [Internet]. Interaktivnoye obrazovaniye. Informatsionno-publitsisticheskiy obrazovatel’nyy zhurnal = Interactive education. Information and journalistic educational journal. Available from: http://interactiv.su/2017/12/31/smeshannoye-obucheniye-innovatsiya-xxi-veka. (In Russ.)
22. Afonin S. 6 modeley smeshannogo obucheniya = 6 models of blended learning [Internet]. Available from: http://sergeyafonin.ru/6-modelej-smeshannogo-obucheniya/. (In Russ.)
23. Pushkareva T. P., Kalitina V. V. On the formation of mathematical competence of students based on the design-target approach [Internet]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern problems of science and education. 2019; Available from: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=29081. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Pushkaryeva T.P., Kalitina V.V. The Blended Learning Science Training. Open Education. 2020;24(2):39-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2020-2-39-46