Video and Online Courses in the Educational Process of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics: opportunities, advantages and problems for students and professors

The aim of the study is to identify the factors which determine the demand and possibility of integrating e-learning — mainly, video and online courses - into the teaching process of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE). The problem area is discussed from the positions of lecturers and students. The hypothesis is based on the assumption that online techniques are positively perceived by both sides, despite a number of limitations which reduced professors’ enthusiasm for expanding the scope of traditional teaching methods. The necessity to find out the motives and clarify the arguments for and against the use of online and video technologies is aimed at solving the practical problem of maximizing the potential of the university in the modern educational environment. The results of the study allow developing recommendations for the creation of effective programs, which should include transparent motivations as well as effective instructions and schemes of work and interaction between departments, lecturers and students of the university, contributing innovative processes in higher education.

Materials and methods include the creation of a theoretical background based on published assessments of Russian and foreign experts regarding the development of Smart Education, as well as on existing examples of effective use of e-learning in universities, and critical study of this experience, taking into account the specifics of PRUE. The field study was conducted by means of a survey of university faculty and students. The content of the questionnaires for each group (lecturer/student) was determined by the purpose of the study adjusted for specifics of each party. The methodical approach allowed to build an objective picture of the perspective and readiness to increase the application of e-learning approaches in PRUE.

The study results demonstrate a generally positive attitude of students and professors to the introduction of e-learning in the process of teaching in PRUE. At the same time, a certain amount of skepticism and critical reaction of lecturers to the spread of the online component in the educational process has been revealed. The paper provides specific data on the lecturers’ concerns associated with the expansion of e-learning tools in their work. The main problems relate to the need for personal adaptation to the digital space, misunderstanding of the principles of enshrining authorship and recording virtual courses in academic workload, etc.

Conclusion. Identified factors of the greatest influence on the perception of online and video tools by students and lecturers at PRUE reveal several difficulties concerning the development of educational technologies. However, they are mostly. Appropriate increase of the online component in the structure of academic discipline, the offer of various forms of interactive, mastery of the skills of applying the latest technical achievements represent today the most important elements of the progressiveness of the higher education. The conclusions of the study are proposed for consideration in the development of Plekhanov University’s plans related to the innovative tasks of the university.

1. Beloglazov A.A., Beloglazova L.B., Beloglazova I.A., Mal’tsev O.L., Trubacheyev Ye.V., Nikiforova S.A., Popenko V.V., Educational technologies of online learning: analysis of massive open online courses of Russian universities. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Informatika i informatizatsiya obrazovaniya = Bulletin of Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series: Informatics and Informatization of Education. 2018; 4 (46): 50—57. (In Russ.)

2. Varshavskaya Yu. Mogut li onlayn-kursy zamenit’ uchobu v universitete = Can online courses replace university studies. URL: https://mel.fm/obrazovaniye/7629051-online_university (cited: 23.09.2019) . (In Russ.)

3. Grigor’yeva N.V., Petunova S.A., Onlayn-kouching i onlayn-trening kak novyye napravleniya obucheniya. V sbornike: ROST — Razvitiye, Obrazovaniye, Strategii, Tekhnologii. Sbornik materialov II Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii = Online coaching and online training as new areas of learning. In the collection: GROWTH — Development, Education, Strategy, Technology. Collection of materials of the II AllRussian scientific-practical conference. Cheboksary: Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanova; 2019: 37—41. (In Russ.)

4. Gotskaya I. B., Zhuchkov V. M. The current state, problems and prospects for the development of mass open online courses. Prepodavatel’ XXI vek = Teacher of the XXI century. 2016; 4 (1): 117— 127. (In Russ.)

5. Danchenok L.A., Zaytseva A.S., Komleva N.V. Transformation of the model of additional education in the digital economy. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2019; 23; 1: 34—45. (In Russ.)

6. Dikanskaya Yu.V. Massive online courses and online services in education. V sbornike: Konkurs molodykh uchonykh. Sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo konkursa = In the collection: Competition for young scientists. Collection of articles of the International Research Competition; Penza: 2020: 226—229. (In Russ.)

7. Issledovaniye Levada-Tsentra: 70 protsentov rossiyan ne vladeyut inostrannymi yazykami = Levada Center study: 70 percent of Russians do not speak foreign languages Tsentr gumanitarnykh tekhnologiy = Center for Humanitarian Technologies. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/news/2014/05/28/6787(cited: 11.10.2019). (In Russ.)

8. Kalenov O.Ye. Characteristics and features of virtual organizations. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G.V. Plekhanova = Bulletin of the Russian Economic University. G.V. Plekhanov. 2018; 5 (101): 117-123. (In Russ.)

9. Kalimullina O.V., Trotsenko I.V. Modern digital educational tools and digital competence: analysis of existing problems and trends. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2018; 22; 3: 6173. (In Russ.)

10. Kiriya I.V. Online education and creative mythology «: the phenomenon of mass open online courses through the prism of the critical theory of media. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10: Zhurnalistika = Moscow University Bulletin. Series 10: Journalism. 2019; 1: 3-24. (In Russ.)

11. Klochkova E.N., Sadovnikova N.A. Transformation of education in the context of digitalization. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2019; 23; 4: 13-22. (In Russ.)

12. Kornilov YU.V., Gosudarev I.B Experience in developing online courses and organizing online learning in higher education. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern problems of science and education. 2019; 5: 60. (In Russ.)

13. Krechetova A. Budushcheye onlayn-obrazovaniya v Rossii: rost i ostorozhnyye investitsii = The future of online education in Russia: growth and cautious investments. URL: https://www.forbes.ru/tehnologii/342961-budushchee-onlayn-obrazovaniya-v-rossii-rost-i-ostorozhnye-investicii (cited: 28.09.2019). (In Russ.)

14. Kuptsova O.V. Advantages and problems of online learning (for example, the implementation of the online course «Jurisprudence»). Pravo i obrazovaniye = Law and education. 2019; 8: 55-61. (In Russ.)

15. Otkrytyye programmy distantsionnogo obucheniya. © studyglobe.ru.= Open distance learning programs. © studyglobe.ru. URL: https://studyglobe.ru/distanzionnoe/udacity.html (cited:10.12.2019) . (In Russ.)

16. Petrova L. Ye., Kuz’min K.V. Virtual academic mobility of students through MOOs: methodological decisions of the university teacher. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii = Pedagogical education in Russia. 2015; 12: 177182. (In Russ.)

17. Petrovskaya I.A. Management as a discipline: problems and tasks of teaching. Nauchnyy zhurnal Chelovecheskiy kapital i professional’noye obrazovaniye = Scientific journal Human Capital and Professional Education. 2017; 2; 22: 29-35. (In Russ.)

18. Povnyy A. Vidy onlayn-obucheniya (lektsii, seminary, video-kursy, onlayn-kursy, treningi) -v chem razlichiye? = Types of online education (lectures, seminars, video courses, online courses, trainings) - what is the difference? URL: http://www.electrolibrary.info/information/78-vidy-onlayn-obucheniya-v-chem-razlichie.html (cited: 23.09.2019) . (In Russ.)

19. Ryzhkina N.A., Gardt M.A. Online education on the example of open online courses (Russian and foreign aspects of the issue). V sbornike: Sovremennyye tendentsii i innovatsii v nauke i proizvodstve. Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 20-letiyu filiala KuzGTU v g. Mezhdurechenske = In the collection: Modern trends and innovations in science and production. Materials of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 20th anniversary of the branch of KuzGTU in Mezhdurechensk. 2018: 269—271. (In Russ.)

20. Alhabeeb A., Rowley J. E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers & Education. 2018; 127(1): 1—12. Elsevier Ltd. URL: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/200473/ (cited: 11.10.2019)

21. Gibson S.G., Harris M.L., Colaric S.M. Technology Acceptance in an Academic Context: Faculty Acceptance of Online Education // Journal of Education for Business. 2008; 83(6): 355—359. URL: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/74676/ (cited: 09.10.2019)

22. OtzyvMarketing — avtoritetnyye otzyvy ot spetsialistov intrernet-rynka= OtzyvMarketing — authoritative reviews from experts on the Internet market. URL: https://otzyvmarketing.ru/udemy/ (cited 11.12.2019). (In Russ.)