A Method for the Automatic Selection of Training Tasks in Learning Environment for IT Students

Purpose of research. The research, the results of which are presented in this article, was carried out in order to activate and improve the efficiency of independent work of students in the information environment of learning by rational individual selection of training tasks. In the process of the research, a method for automatically selecting tasks for self-completion was developed and implemented in the educational process, based on predicting the difficulty and learning effect of the task for a specific student, taking into account the complexity of the task and the student’s readiness to perform this task.

Methods and materials. The article provides a distinction between the concepts of complexity, difficulty, and the learning effect of training tasks. On this basis, the task of predicting the level of difficulty of the task for the student is set as a task of automatic classification of “student-task" pairs, which represent a set of characteristics of the student and the task that are available in the database of the e-learning system. The result of the classification is a forecast of the level of difficulty of the task for the student, on the basis of which a decision is made about the learning effect of this task.

The classification problem is one of the well-developed machine learning tasks “with a lecturer". Decision trees were selected from several well-known trained classification models for implementation, since they, unlike neural networks, represent prediction rules in a visual form, while highlighting significant features. The learning phase of the model consists of building a decision tree based on a training sample containing data on precedents for students to complete tasks. As a result of the computational experiment, decision trees were built for several disciplines that practice automatic verification of students’ decisions, i.e. there is data for forming a training sample.

Results. The article provides an example of a decision tree based on a training sample, which is formed on the basis of data from an electronic workshop on the discipline “Foreign language ". The quality of the predictive model was determined on the exam sample by the criteria of accuracy and generalizing ability (the degree of severity of the “retraining effect”). The obtained values of these indicators allow us to recognize the quality as acceptable. The first results ofpractical application of the proposed method of selecting tasks in the educational process are analyzed. The software developed in the process of the research can be considered as the basis of a recommendation system that can not replace live communication between the student and the lecturer, but is their smart assistant in the learning process.

Conclusion. In general, the results of the research show that the capabilities of artificial intelligence technologies, in particular, machine learning, allow us to put into practice the principle of individualized learning, to adapt the learning process to the individual characteristics of each student in order to effectively develop their professional competencies. The proposed method is implemented and tested in the information environment of training students of IT areas of Vologda State University, however, this approach is quite universal, and it can be extended to other subject areas and forms of training.

1. Rybina G.V. Intelligent technology for building training integrated expert systems: new opportunities. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2017; 4: 43-57. DOI: 10.21686/1818- 4243-2017-4-43-57. (In Russ.)

2. Komleva N.V. MOOCs should look towards expanding their adaptability. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2014; 4 (105): 89-96. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2014-4(105-89-96. (In Russ.)

3. Tel’nov YU.F., Kazakov V.A., Kozlova O.A. Dynamic intellectual process control system in the information and educational space of higher educational institutions. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2013; 1 (96): 40-49. (In Russ.)

4. Burnyashov V.A. Personalization as a global trend in e-learning in higher education institutions [Internet]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern problems of science and education. 2017; 1. Available from: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=26078 (cited . (In Russ.)

5. Knewton: adaptive learning in action [Internet]. Newtonew: novosti setevogo obrazovaniya = Newtonew: network education news. Available from: https://newtonew.com/tech/knewton-adaptivnoe-obuchenie-v-dejstvii (cited 20.01.20). (In Russ.)

6. Grushevskiy S.P., Dobrovol’skaya N.YU. Computer neural network technologies in individualized training of students of mathematical specialties. Nauka v vuzakh: matematika, fizika, informatika. Problemy vysshego i srednego professional’nogo obrazovaniya: materialy Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-obrazovatel’naya konferentsiya = Science in universities: mathematics, physics, computer science. Problems of higher and secondary vocational education: materials of the International Scientific and Educational Conference. Moscow: RUDN; 2009: 872-874. (In Russ.)

7. Mitsel’A.A., PogudaA.A. Informationprocessing technology in testing tasks based on a neural network. Sovremennoye obrazovatel’noye prostranstvo: puti modernizatsii: trudy Mezhdunarodnaya zaochnaya Nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya = Modern educational space: modernization paths: proceedings of the International Correspondence Scientific and Practical Conference. Cheboksary, 2011: 122-127. (In Russ.)

8. Selevko G.K. Entsiklopediya obrazovatel’nykh tekhnologiy= Encyclopedia of educational technology. Moscow: Public education; 2005. 556 p. (In Russ.)

9. Uman A. I. Tekhnologicheskiy podkhod k obucheniyu: uchebnoye posobiye dlya vuzov = Technological approach to learning: a textbook for universities. Moscow: Yurayt; 2018. 187 p. (In Russ.)

10. Ball G.A. Teoriya uchebnykh zadach: Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiy aspect = Theory of educational problems: Psychological and pedagogical aspect. Moscow: Pedagogika= Pedagogy; 1990. 184 p. (In Russ.)

11. Uglev V.A. Training adaptive testing using expert systems. Information technology in education and science. Sbornik materialov vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii = Collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference. Moscow: MFA; 2006: 606-611. (In Russ.)

12. Rzheutskaya S. YU., Kharina M. V. Integrated learning environment as a means of developing students’ foreign language communicative competence. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2016; 1: 43-48. (In Russ.)

13. Sinitsa Ye. M., Burtsev M. S. Description of educational resources: metadata, standards, profiles. Obrazovatel’nyye tekhnologii i obshchestvo = Educational technologies and society. 2006; 9(1): 365-373. (In Russ.)

14. Andrianov I. A., Grigor’yeva A. A. Effective search for plagiarism in program code for a remote programming workshop system. Informatization of engineering education. Trudy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii INFORINO -2016 = Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference INFORINO. 2016: 485488. (In Russ.)

15. Aleshchenko A.S., Trembach V.M. Intellectual educational system of the university department. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open education. 2016; 5: 47-52. (In Russ.)

16. Chelyshkova M. B. Adaptivnoye testirovaniye v obrazovanii (teoriya, metodologiya, tekhnologiya) = Adaptive testing in education (theory, methodology, technology). Moscow: ICTSPS; 2001. 165 p. (In Russ.)

17. Avanesov V. S. Pedagogical measurements: language and concepts. Pedagogicheskaya diagnostika = Pedagogical diagnostics. 2015; 2: 3-16. (In Russ.)

18. Naymushina O.E., Starichenko B.Ye. Multivariate assessment of the complexity of educational tasks. Obrazovaniye i nauka = Education and Science. 2010; 2 (70): 58-69. (In Russ.)

19. Strotova M.N. Possible classification of physical problems and their identification. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2009; 318: 208-210. (In Russ.)

20. Vygotskiy L.S. Myshleniye i rech’ = Thinking and Speech. Moscow: Labyrinth; 1999. 352 p. (In Russ.)

21. Klopchenko V.S. To the question of pedagogical forecasting. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2008; 5: 23-29. (In Russ.)

22. Brink KH., Richards Dzh, Feverolf M. Mashinnoye obucheniye Machine Learning. Saint Petersburg: Peter; 2017. 336 p. (In Russ.)

23. Barsegyan A. A., Kupriyanov M. S., Kholod I.I., Tess M.D., Yelizarov S.I. Analiz dannykh i protsessov: ucheb. posobiye— 3-ye izdaniye = Analysis of data and processes: textbook. allowance - 3rd edition. Saint Petersburg: BHV-Petersburg; 2009. 512 p. (In Russ.)

24. Davydova Ye. N., Sergushicheva A. P. Models of the learner and teacher for the multiagent learning system. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2015; 5: 25-31. (In Russ.)

25. Rzheutskiy A.V., Sukonshchikov A.A. Evolutionary decision tree construction algorithm. Programmnyye produkty i sistemy = Software products and systems. 2011; 3: 22-26. (In Russ.)

26. Kharina M.V. Development models of foreign language communicative competence of students of a technical university in an integrated information educational environment. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik. Psikhologo- pedagogicheskiye nauki = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. Psychological and pedagogical sciences. 2014; 2; 4: 114-118. (In Russ.)