Online Course of the Lecturer PersonalizedTraining for Network Educational Activity

Recently, the industry of creating online lecturer courses became very popular. However, despite their significant number, the satisfaction of the trainees of these courses is not very high. The value of online education for practicing lecturers should be associated with personalized knowledge relevant to their professional activities and the possibility of gaining work experience in a modern open educational environment. The ability to professionally carry out distributed-collective activities in teaching children in the context of mass communication and globalization of education are becoming an important component of a teacher’s digital literacy. The experience of implementing the “Mega-class” project in the context of educational clusters, organized by the Academic Department of Informatics and Information Technologies of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University, made it possible to identify significant deficiencies in the lecturer’s professional training for such activities and the need for recursive professional development directly in the process of organizing Mega-lessons. At the same time, the different level of lecturers’ readiness for the network educational activities and a significant range of professional aspirations should be noted.

The purpose of this study is to create and substantiate a personalized model of the online lecturer training course for the network educational activities in a digital environment using the example of the Megaclass platform.

The idea of creating personalized online courses is associated with the transformation of educational content into a problem-question format for structuring course modules (inverted course). Such a restructuring of educational content makes it possible to change the learning strategy: from the paradigm of “accumulating knowledge for solving problems” to the paradigm of “solving problems by mastering the necessary knowledge”.

As a result of the analysis of the types of activities and possible deficits of all participants in the educational cluster in the design and conducting mega-lessons, a model of a personalized online course for preparing lecturers for the network educational activities was proposed. On its basis, the online course “Technology for developing and conducting a Mega-lesson” was developed, consisting of modules that answer the questions: what is a Mega-lesson, how to design an effectively-target model, how to form soft-skills, how to select content, how to design an organizational and activity model of the lesson, how to select the content of the lesson, how to organize the interaction of participants, develop or search for digital resources and services, etc. Training is organized in the process of real professional activity in the design and conducting of Mega-lessons in the educational cluster conditions. The course is hosted on the platform “Electronic University Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafiev”, it was tested in training school teachers in the process of preparing Mega-lessons, students of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafiev within the discipline “Methods of teaching computer science”.

Conclusion. The proposed method of personalizing an online course allows you to improve its consumer qualities, significantly raise the level of student satisfaction by switching to a learning strategy “from my professional deficits to the necessary knowledge” and the possibility of choosing an individual training route. The materials of the article may be of interest to developers of online courses, as well as lecturers who want to acquire the necessary knowledge and experience in educational clusters, in particular, on the Mega-class platform.

1. Semenova T. V., Vilkova K. A. Contribution of characteristics of participants in massive open online courses (MOOCs) in the formation of the level of satisfaction with learning. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny = Monitoring of public opinion: Economic and social changes. 2019; 4: 262-277. (In Russ.)

2. Bulger M. Personalized Learning: The Conversations We’re Not Having [Internet]. Data a. Soc. Research Inst. Available from: https://datasociety.net/pubs/ecl/PersonalizedLearning_primer_2016.pdf. (cited 12.10.2020)

3. Kargina Z.A. Individualization, personalization, personification - the leading trends in the development of education in the XXI century: an overview of modern scientific research. Nauka i obrazovaniye: sovremennyye trendy = Science and education: modern trends. 2015; 2: 172–187. (In Russ.)

4. Kazakova Ye.I., Yermakov D.S., Kirillov P.N. et al. Personalizirovannaya model’ obrazovaniya: metodicheskoye posobiye = Personalized model of education: a methodological guide. Moscow: ANO «Platform of a new school»; 2019: 27-33. (In Russ.)

5. Programma «Tsifrovaya platforma personalizirovannogo obrazovaniya v shkole». Programma realizuyetsya v ramkakh natsproyekta «Obrazovaniye» po porucheniyu Prezidenta RF ot 30.01.2019 g. № Pr-118 =. Program «Digital platform for personalized education at school». The program is being implemented within the framework of the Education national project on behalf of the President of the Russian Federation dated January 30, 2019 No. Pr-118 [Internet]. Available from: https://vbudushee.ru/education/soderzhanieobrazovaniya/programma-platforma-novoy-shkoly/ (cited 12.10.2020). (In Russ.)

6. Yermakov D.S., Kirillov P.N. Personalized model in «digital». Obrazovatel’naya politika = Educational policy. 2019; 3(79): 132-141. (In Russ.)

7. Kirillov P. A. Artificial intelligence for education. Adaptive learning system. Molodoy uchenyy = Young scientist. 2020; 27(317): 39-43. (In Russ.)

8. Kolmychevskaya Ye.S. Models for building customized courses and their scope. eLearning Stakeholders and Researchers Summit 2018:= eLearning Stakeholders and Researchers Summit 2018. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics; 2018: 63-76. (In Russ.)

9. Pak N.I., Potupchik Ye.G., Khegay L.B. The concept of transformational and inverted electronic textbooks. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya «Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya» = Bulletin of RUDN. Series «Informatization of Education». 2020; 17: 2. (In Russ.)

10. Ivkina L.M., Pak N.I. Tekhnologiya «Mega-class» technology as a means of collective learning activity in educational clusters. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2015; 5(112): 32-38. (In Russ.)

11. Pak N.I. From classroom system to cluster education: educational technological platform «Mega-class». Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnoprakticheskaya konferentsiya «Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya-2016» = International scientific and practical conference «Informatization of education-2016». Moscow: SSU Publishing House; 2016: 467-475. (In Russ.)

12. Doroshenko Ye.G., Ivkina L.M., Pak N.I., Khegay L.B., Yakovleva T.A. Organizatsiya i provedeniye mega-urokov v obrazovatel’nykh klasterakh = Organization and conduct of megalessons in educational clusters Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafieva; 2019. 72 p. (In Russ.)

13. Doroshenko Ye.G., Ivkina L.M., Pak N.I., Khegay L.B., Yakovleva T.A. Selection of the content of the teacher training program for conducting mega-lessons based on the cognitive approach. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya «Informatika i informatizatsiya obrazovaniya» = Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series «Informatics and informatization of education». 2020; 2(52). (In Russ.)

14. Doroshenko Ye.G., Ivkina L.M., Pak N.I., Khegay L.B., Yakovleva T.A. Tekhnologiya razrabotki i provedeniya Mega-uroka: uchebnoye posobiye = Technology for the development and implementation of the Mega-lesson: a tutorial. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafieva; 2020. 92 p. (In Russ.)

15. Karastelev V.Ye. What is the modern culture of questioning? How to teach you to ask your own questions and not borrow someone else’s? Sovremennoye obrazovaniye = Modern education. 2018; 4: 104-118. (In Russ.)

16. Karastelev V.Ye., Danilova V.L., Yelizarova Ye.M. Study of the results of sessions of interactive questioning [Internet]. Interaktivnoye obrazovaniye: Informatsionno publitsisticheskiy obrazovatel’nyy zhurnal = Interactive education: Information publicistic educational journal. 2020; 2. Available from: https://interactiv.su/wpcontent/uploads/2020/06/IO_20_2-blok.pdf. (cited 12.10.2020). (In Russ.)

17. Danilova V.L., Yelizarova Ye.M., Karastelev V.Ye. Interactive questioning as one of the technologies of modern education [Internet]. Interaktivnoye obrazovaniye: Informatsionno publitsisticheskiy obrazovatel’nyy zhurnal = Interactive education: Information publicistic educational journal. 2020; 2. Available from: https://interactiv.su/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/IO_20_2-blok.pdf. (cited 12.10.2020). (In Russ.)

18. Moore M. Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education. 1989; 3: 1-7. DOI: 10.1080/08923648909526659. (cited 12.10.2020)

19. Korporativnyy universitet Sberbanka = Corporate University of Sberbank [Internet]. Available from: https://sberbank-university.ru/edutech-club/glossary/901/. (cited 12.10.2020). (In Russ.)

20. Nabavi R. T. Bandura’s social learning theory & social cognitive learning theory [Internet]. Theory of Developmental Psychology. 2012. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267750204_Bandura’s_Social_Learning_Theory_Social_Cognitive_Learning_Theory. (cited 12.10.2020)