Research discussion groups as a component of the development of practical skills of students in the field of training “Construction”
https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2019-5-14-22
Abstract
The modern educational process, including theoretical and practical development of the basic educational program, provides that 40% of the basic information the student is receiving during the classes, the remaining 60% — for self-study. Research, practical and creative discussion groups in educational institutions of different levels (school, college, University) are helping talented and interested young people to develop their abilities and find their practical application. At the same time, significant assistance is provided by the use of modern teaching methods through long distance education, including systems of electronic educational and methodical complexes of disciplines and practices; systems that provide interactive communication of all subjects of the educational process, including industrial enterprises.
The purpose of this article is to analyze the efficiency of research discussion groups in educational institutions of the construction areas with the aim of generating interest in the chosen occupation, the development of creative skills of the talented youth, opportunities to exercise their author’s ideas and inventive work “products" on the market of goods and services, as well as the development implementation into the educational process of schools and attract pupils to project work in view of the networking cooperation on the regional cyber platform. The role of the head of the group is to arouse the interest of students to the proposed research topics, to teach them to use computer technology not only to search for data on new technical solutions, but also to exchange information between the participants of the educational process, i.e. search for like-minded people, including from other educational institutions in different regions.
Work in research groups of technical creativity in many respects facilitates process of development of occupations and specialties, gives the chance to expand and deepen area of knowledge, allows students to direct process, and for teachers to transfer part of this experience to occupations in classes to large audience, to involve all wishing to new projects.
This makes it possible to obtain better knowledge, increase the level of training and high learning outcomes of students and pupils, preparing them for admission to universities by increasing motivation through a variety offorms of technology, including e-learning, on-line training. Modern working conditions make competitive those graduates who can prove their professional versatility, diversity of knowledge and interests, high adaptability to any working conditions, as well as a high potential for self-development. In the current labor market conditions, there is a demand exclusively for highly qualified specialists of vocational professions, mid-level specialists (group leader, craftsman) and senior personnel (for example, site supervisor). In such circumstances, one diploma of education is not enough for those who want to move quickly up the career ladder.
Thus, at low costs for the transfer and exchange of information (knowledge and experience), we are able to provide both individual and collective way of development of research and creative abilities of students, to form persons, interested in further self-development, and as a result — the graduates, prepared for professional activity.
About the Authors
N. I. TaraseevaRussian Federation
Nelli I. Taraseeva
O. V. Baulina
Russian Federation
Oksana V. Baulina
N. A. Dezhinova
Russian Federation
Nataliya A. Dezhinova
References
1. Kirdyankina S.V. Subprogram “Gifted children”. Nauchno-metodicheskiy zhurnal zamestitelya direktora po vospitatel’noy rabote = Scientific and methodological journal of the deputy director for educational work. 2007; 4. (In Russ.)
2. Bayborodova L. V., Repina A. V. Organization of network interaction of educational institutions in the implementation of innovative projectp. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2013; 3.
3. Taraseyeva N.I., Baulina O.V The effectiveness of innovative technologies in the organization of practical training. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open Education. 2019; 23(2): 14-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2019-2-14-22. (In Russ.)
4. The deep peak of the «New Economy». Biznes zhurnal dlya malogo i srednego biznesa = Business magazine for small and medium-sized businessep. 2008; 5: 76. (In Russ.)
5. Antonin M. A. Interactive teaching methods as a potential for the personal development of studentp. Psikhologiya obucheniya = Learning Psychology. 2010; 12: 53-63. (In Russ.)
6. Putin V. V. On secondary vocational education in St. Petersburg. GlavSprav [Internet]. Available from: http://edu.glavsprav.ru/spb/spo/journal/392/ (In Russ.)
7. Rogozhin S. A. Material and technical support of the educational process — a necessary condition for the quality of education. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysip. 2004; 4(32): l9-26. (In Russ.)
8. Sredstva distantsionnogo obucheniya. Metodika, tekhnologiya, instrumentariy = Means of distance learning. Methodology, technology, tools [Internet]. Available from: http://edutools.h12.ru/compare/. (In Russ.)
9. Solyankina L.Ye. Uchebno-metodicheskiy kompleks kak sredstvo professional’nogo samorazvitiya studenta = Educational complex as a means of professional self-development of a student. Volgograd: 1999. 217 p. (In Russ.)
10. Vul’fov B.Z. Pedagogicheskiye situatsii = Pedagogical situations. Moscow: Pedagogical Society of Russia; 2001. (In Russ.)
11. Blagov Ye.YU., Leshcheva I.A., Shcherban S.A. Ontological approach in the practice of educational activities: the formation of the trajectories of individual professional development of students. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye = Open education. 2018; 22(5): 26-39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2018-5-26-39 (In Russ.)
12. Bayborodova L. V., Repina A. V. Organization of network interaction of educational institutions in the implementation of innovative projects. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2013; 4. (In Russ.)
13. Osipov A. M., Karstan’ye P., Tumalev V. V., Zarubin V. G. On social partnership in the field of education. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. 2008; 11: 108-115. (In Russ.)
14. Taraseyeva N.I., Baulina O.V., Sukhova O.I., Sukhov YA.I. Project activities in the field of landscape design and construction (as a component of the development of students’ practical skills). Aktual’nyye problemy nauki i praktiki v razlichnykh otraslyakh narodnogo khozyaystva: sb. dokladov II Natsional’noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Chast’ 1 Gradostroitel’stvo i arkhitektura = Actual
15. problems of science and practice in various sectors of the economy: Sat. reports of the II National Scientific and Practical Conference. Part 1 Urban planning and architecture. Penza: PGUAS; 2019: 72-76. (In Russ.)
16. Bartenev A.N. Workshop as a form of educational activity. Professional’noye obrazovaniye = Professional Education. 2008; 5: 14. (In Russ.)
17. Maslyakov Ye.G. Tekhnicheskoye tvorchestvo v sisteme srednego professional’nogo obrazovaniya = Technical creativity in the system of secondary vocational education. Moscow: 2007. (In Russ.)
18. Gar’kin I.N., Medvedeva L.M., Nazarova O.M. Internship as a factor in the future employment of students [Internet]. Alleya nauki = Alley of science. 2017; 12(2): 328-331. Available from: http://alley-science.ru/domains_data/files/August17/ (In Russ.)
19. Obucheniye po professii «svarshchik» s pomoshch’yu novykh obrazovatel’nykh tekhnologiy = Training in the profession of «welder» with the help of new educational technologies. Moscow: 2008. (In Russ.)
20. Vasin S.A., Goloden O.YU., Besfamil’naya S.V. invalidy v Rossii: prichiny i dinamika invalidnosti, protivorechiya i perspektivy sotsial’noy politiki = disabled people in Russia: causes and dynamics of disability, contradictions and prospects of social policy. Moscow: 1999. (In Russ.)
21. Pryazhnikov N.S., Sergeyev I.S. Leisure selfdetermination in the system of career guidance [Internet]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern problems of science and education. 2015; 4. Available from: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=20959. (In Russ.)
22. Ratnikova Ye.V. Diagnosis of types of professional mastery of a teacher. Professional’noye obrazovaniye = Vocational education. 2008; 4: 10. (In Russ.)
23. Astanin S.V., Kalashnikova T.G. Development of an individual model of student behavior in the distance education system. Perspektivnyye informatsionnyye tekhnologii i intellektual’nyye sistemy = Promising information technologies and intelligent systems. Taganrog: TRTU. 2001; 179-196. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Taraseeva N.I., Baulina O.V., Dezhinova N.A. Research discussion groups as a component of the development of practical skills of students in the field of training “Construction”. Open Education. 2019;23(5):14-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2019-5-14-22